2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0029-8018(99)00057-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A wave model for the Great Barrier Reef

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, sub-grid obstruction scheme from the original WAVEWATCH III model is kept to count for islands unresolved by the 6-km resolution. The sub-grid obstruction scheme follows the approach of Hardy et al [11] with some modifications [41].…”
Section: Advection-diffusion Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, sub-grid obstruction scheme from the original WAVEWATCH III model is kept to count for islands unresolved by the 6-km resolution. The sub-grid obstruction scheme follows the approach of Hardy et al [11] with some modifications [41].…”
Section: Advection-diffusion Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach of Hardy et al (2000) is to represent the blocking/scattering of wave energy by topography using sub-grid approximations. With this method, a transparency matrix that is dependent on wave direction and geographic location is specified within the model.…”
Section: Addressing Error Due To Coarse Geographic Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent studies conducted principally by JCU-MMU provided updated TC-induced surge plus tide updates for selected east coast sites (Hardy et al 2004a, b) all with and without allowance for predicted enhanced-greenhouse effects by 2050. This work was done using the JCU-MMU storm surge, wave and TC wind field models that had been extensively calibrated over many years (Bode and Mason 1994;Hardy et al 2001;James and Mason 2005). A series of demonstration hindcasts of significant historical storms indicated that peak surge levels were likely reproducible within 5% of measured values provided that adequate meteorological and bathymetric data was available.…”
Section: Queensland Climate Change Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneous wave modelling using a modified WAM model (Hardy et al 2001), which added significant computational burden, could not be undertaken for all selected east coast sites and was therefore limited to the high priority areas of Hervey Bay and the Sunshine Coast (Hardy et al 2004a) in the southern portion of the State (e.g. domain B1).…”
Section: Queensland Climate Change Studymentioning
confidence: 99%