1997
DOI: 10.1115/1.2787282
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Volume Integral Equation Technique for Multiple Inclusion and Crack Interaction Problems

Abstract: A volume integral equation method is introduced for the solution of elastostatic problems in heterogeneous solids containing interacting multiple inclusions, voids, and cracks. The method is applied to two-dimensional problems involving long parallel cylindrical inclusions and cracks. The influence of interface layers on the interfacial stress field is investigated. The stress intensity factors for microcracks in the presence of interacting inclusions or voids are also calculated for a variety of model geometr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the classical multizone boundary element method (in which the integral equation for each inclusion and the matrix must be discretized to form a corresponding matrix equation, together with the coupling of each interface bonding condition, the resulting solvable equation can be formed), the present method avoids forming integral equation for each inclusion in which the problem of sharp corners has to be dealt with as explained above. As mentioned by Lee et al (1997), ''as the number of boundary increases, the VIEM (volume integral equation method) becomes more efficient than the BEM; the need to satisfy interface conditions at all the interfaces makes BIEM much more cumbersome to use''…”
Section: Some Remarks About the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the classical multizone boundary element method (in which the integral equation for each inclusion and the matrix must be discretized to form a corresponding matrix equation, together with the coupling of each interface bonding condition, the resulting solvable equation can be formed), the present method avoids forming integral equation for each inclusion in which the problem of sharp corners has to be dealt with as explained above. As mentioned by Lee et al (1997), ''as the number of boundary increases, the VIEM (volume integral equation method) becomes more efficient than the BEM; the need to satisfy interface conditions at all the interfaces makes BIEM much more cumbersome to use''…”
Section: Some Remarks About the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stress field within and outside the inclusions can also be determined in a similar manner. The details of the numerical treatment of (1) for plane elastostatic problems can be found in [5]. Further explanation of the volume integral equation method for isotropic inclusions in an isotropic matrix can also be found in Section 4.3 "Volume Integral Equation Method" by Buryachenko [16].…”
Section: Volume Integral Equation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can, therefore in principle, be determined through the solution of the equation. An algorithm for the solution of (1) was developed by Lee and Mal [5] by discretizing the inclusions using conventional finite elements. Once u(x) within the inclusions is determined, the displacement field in the matrix can be calculated from (1) by evaluating the integral for x ∉ .…”
Section: Volume Integral Equation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In response, we have used the direct integration scheme introduced by Cerrolaza and Alarcon [13], Li et al [14], and Lu and Ye [15] after suitable modifications to address these singularity concerns. A description of the modified method used in the discretization of the volume integral equation is given by Lee and Mal [7,16].…”
Section: Scattering Of Sh Waves In An Unbounded Isotropic Matrix Contmentioning
confidence: 99%