1984
DOI: 10.1029/gl011i003p00225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A volcanomagnetic observation on Mount St. Helens, Washington

Abstract: Total magnetic fields were recorded at five sites on Mt. St. Helens between 23 October and 11 November 1981, an interval which included an extrusive dome‐building eruption of the volcano. Two of the magnetometers located in the volcano's crater measured reversible magnetic changes, which correspond to fluctuations in tilt measured nearby. However, the relationship is highly nonlinear. Electric fields were measured on the east flank of the volcano near its summit to search for electrokinetic effects. They show … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes in the local magnetic field of up to a few tens of nanoteslas (nT) have been reported during volcanic activity (Rikitake, 1951;Johnston and Stacey, 1969a, b;Pozzi et al, 1979;Johnston et al, 1981;Zlotnicki and Le Mouël, 1988;Honkura et al, 1995;Sasai et al, 1990;Zlotnicki et al, 1993;Tanaka, 1993Tanaka, , 1995. The available data indicate that small-amplitude magnetic signals of a few nT can occur at the most dangerous volcanoes, such as explosive andesitic volcanoes (Johnston et al, 1981;Davis et al, 1984;Zlotnicki, 1986;Zlotnicki et al, 1987;Tanaka, 1995;Zlotnicki and Bof, 1998), including Merapi Volcano, the most intensively monitored volcano in Indonesia.…”
Section: Higuchi's Fractal Dimension Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in the local magnetic field of up to a few tens of nanoteslas (nT) have been reported during volcanic activity (Rikitake, 1951;Johnston and Stacey, 1969a, b;Pozzi et al, 1979;Johnston et al, 1981;Zlotnicki and Le Mouël, 1988;Honkura et al, 1995;Sasai et al, 1990;Zlotnicki et al, 1993;Tanaka, 1993Tanaka, , 1995. The available data indicate that small-amplitude magnetic signals of a few nT can occur at the most dangerous volcanoes, such as explosive andesitic volcanoes (Johnston et al, 1981;Davis et al, 1984;Zlotnicki, 1986;Zlotnicki et al, 1987;Tanaka, 1995;Zlotnicki and Bof, 1998), including Merapi Volcano, the most intensively monitored volcano in Indonesia.…”
Section: Higuchi's Fractal Dimension Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system was powered by Air Cells and recorded onto two Russtrack recorders with coarse (2V) and fine (200mV) ranges. It survived about two years and we have records during the last of the explosive eruptions of 1980 (16-18 October) and during some extrusion events in 1981 when we also recorded magnetic fields in the crater of the volcano (DAVIS et al, 1984).…”
Section: The Electrokinetic Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further reason for measuring electrokinetic effects on a volcano is the possibility that the magnetic events that have been observed on a number of volcanoes (JOHNSTON and STACEY, 1969a, b;DAVIS et al, 1979DAVIS et al, , 1984 and some earthquakes (SASAI and ISHIKAWA, 1980;SHAPIRO and ABDULLABEKOV, 1983;JOHNSTON and MUELLER, 1987) are not in fact due to piezomagnetic effects in crustal rock, the favored explanation, but are due to changes in the current flow pattern in the earth. Thus, simultaneous measurement of magnetic and electric fields could, in principle, help to discriminate between "magnetokinetic" and piezomagnetic effects which can occur with or without, respectively, substantial associated electric field changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors such as Kalashnikov (1954), Stacey (1963), Nagata (1970, and Stacey and Johnston (1972) have suggested the tectonomagnetic method for predicting crustal failure. Studies oftectonomagnetic effects have been and are currently being conducted in many regions of the world and magnetic field changes associated with earthquakes have been identified by several authors such as Fujita (1965), Tazima (1968), Yamazaki and Rikitake (1970), Abdullabekov et al (1972), Smith and Johnston (1976), Raleigh et al (1977), Shapiro and Abdullabekov (1982), Davis et al (1984), Coutin et al (1985), Rikitake (1987), Sasai (1989). The aim of this paper is to present a comprehensive interpretation of the relationship between local magnetic anomalies and seismic activity in the investigation area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%