IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, 2005. 2005
DOI: 10.1109/mwsym.2005.1516847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A very low power SiGe LNA for UWB application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reverse isolation is better than 37 dB across the 3.1 to 10.6 GHz band. The [5] 2.9 0.87 15.1 ± 1.4 S 11,max < −9.9 9 (3.0-11) (3.1-10.6) (3.1-10.6) 0.18µm SiGe HBT BiCMOS [2] 3.1 0.72 20.3 − 3.5 S 11,max < −7.2 26 (without buffer) (3.0-10.0) (3.0-10.0) (3.0-10.0) 0.8µm SiGe HBT [6] 3.2 0.17 23.5 − 0.6 S 11,max < −8.5 55 (3.1-10.6) (3.1-10.6) (3.1-10.6) 0.18µm SiGe BiCMOS [7] 3.3 0.88 13 − 3 S 11,max < − 7 measured 50 Ω noise figure is depicted in Fig. 6.…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reverse isolation is better than 37 dB across the 3.1 to 10.6 GHz band. The [5] 2.9 0.87 15.1 ± 1.4 S 11,max < −9.9 9 (3.0-11) (3.1-10.6) (3.1-10.6) 0.18µm SiGe HBT BiCMOS [2] 3.1 0.72 20.3 − 3.5 S 11,max < −7.2 26 (without buffer) (3.0-10.0) (3.0-10.0) (3.0-10.0) 0.8µm SiGe HBT [6] 3.2 0.17 23.5 − 0.6 S 11,max < −8.5 55 (3.1-10.6) (3.1-10.6) (3.1-10.6) 0.18µm SiGe BiCMOS [7] 3.3 0.88 13 − 3 S 11,max < − 7 measured 50 Ω noise figure is depicted in Fig. 6.…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown, the noise figure varies from 5 dB at 8 GHz to 6 dB at 18 GHz. Compared to other work [2][3][4][5][6][7], the proposed LNA achieves better noise performance with coverage of the entire X-band and Ku-band. And also, active balun was included in our design, the noise figure of proposed LNA is much lower than total noise figure of other wideband LNAs plus external balun.…”
Section: Noise Figure Analysismentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Compared to other wideband LNA topologies, shunt feedback topology is a good candidate for its easy wideband input matching, smaller chip size and insensitivity to process variations with the use of precision resistors [7] [8]. Although the feedback technique would degrade the noise figure for input matching and consume large amount of current, especially in the CMOS to achieve desired gain.…”
Section: Wideband Lna Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several proposals were introduced lately for the design of low power, UWB CMOS LNA [5][6][7][8]. Due particularly to its low input impedance, the common-gate LNA exhibits an excellent linearity, selectivity, and impedance matching over the common-base LNAs [9].…”
Section: Design Techniques and Proposed Front-end Receiver A Lowmentioning
confidence: 99%