1993
DOI: 10.1287/opre.41.1.179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Variational Inequality Formulation of the Dynamic Network User Equilibrium Problem

Abstract: In the present paper we are concerned with developing more realistic dynamic models of route choice and departure time decisions of transportation network users than have been proposed in the literature heretofore. We briefly review one class of models that is a dynamic generalization of the static Wardropian user equilibrium, the so-called Boston traffic equilibrium. In contrast, we then propose a new class of models that is also a dynamic generalization of the static Wardropian user equilibrium. In particula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
383
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 541 publications
(386 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
383
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…AVI) is concerned, the road travel time is best estimated from the sum of link travel times. Recovering the road travel time from the individual links is typically carried out through a method known as travel time progression (Friesz et al, 1993, Nanthawichit et al, 2013, Shim et al, 2011. Using the formalisation of Friesz et al (1993), given a road defined as a sequence of N connected nodes, we will let τ n,n−1 be the travel time for link (n − 1, n); and ε n (t) the departure time from node n ∈ {1, .…”
Section: Deterministic Travel Time Progressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AVI) is concerned, the road travel time is best estimated from the sum of link travel times. Recovering the road travel time from the individual links is typically carried out through a method known as travel time progression (Friesz et al, 1993, Nanthawichit et al, 2013, Shim et al, 2011. Using the formalisation of Friesz et al (1993), given a road defined as a sequence of N connected nodes, we will let τ n,n−1 be the travel time for link (n − 1, n); and ε n (t) the departure time from node n ∈ {1, .…”
Section: Deterministic Travel Time Progressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is originally proposed by Friesz et al (1993) and extended by Astarita (1996), Wu et al (1998) and Xu et al (1999). The advantage of this approach is to ensure internal consistencies among arc traffic dynamics, flow propagation constraints and arc delay functions under plausible regularity conditions.…”
Section: Dynamic Network User Equilibrium Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the continuous-time models of Friesz et al (1993), Astarita (1996), Wu et al (1998), andXu et al (1999), the arc travel time for vehicles entering the arc at time t is treated as a function of the number of vehicles present on the arc at time t. However, because we are working in discrete time, we must include the arc inflow in the travel time function to capture the average number of vehicles on the arc during each time period. Otherwise, it would be possible in a particular time period to load the network heavily without the delay that reflects the traffic volume accumulated during that time period.…”
Section: Dynamic Network User Equilibrium Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations