2017
DOI: 10.1109/mgrs.2017.2720263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Value-Chain Analysis for the Copernicus Earth Observation Infrastructure Evolution: A Knowledgebase of Users, Needs, Services, and Products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sentinel missions) and in-situ data (airborne and ground-based monitoring networks). A study conducted during the ONION project [22] pointed out that most Copernicus services would benefit from higher temporal resolutions. The study also implemented a structured database to capture value-chain Node instruments Instrument archetypes generated from user needs and their feasible combinations.…”
Section: A Use-case Definition and System Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sentinel missions) and in-situ data (airborne and ground-based monitoring networks). A study conducted during the ONION project [22] pointed out that most Copernicus services would benefit from higher temporal resolutions. The study also implemented a structured database to capture value-chain Node instruments Instrument archetypes generated from user needs and their feasible combinations.…”
Section: A Use-case Definition and System Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study focuses on the identification of the EO measurements gaps in the time frame from 2020-2030, to complement the Copernicus space infrastructure, based on the top 10 use cases [1]. These use cases are not satisfied by the existing Copernicus infrastructure, and they were generated through a quantitative methodology that involved the prioritization of 38 EO data needs (the complete list of the identified needs with their description is presented in Table 1), 96 products across the six Copernicus services, 63 stakeholders, 131 measurements and 48 uses cases, which were scored.…”
Section: Requirements Specifications and Measurements Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology used in this work is described in Figure 1. First, the top 10 use cases were ranked according to the end-user needs [1], and end-user requirements were defined [2]. Second, a database of the future Copernicus instruments and contributing missions was generated to analyze the measurement gaps in the horizon 2020-2030.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The H2020 Operational Network of Individual Observation Node (ONION) project identified the main needs of the space segment infrastructure of the Copernicus system and identified the key technology challenges to be faced in the future, taking into account the user requirements at the center of the design process. The ONION project analyzed the user needs and ranked the top 10 use cases [5]. Each use case is associated with a Copernicus service, and they are formed by a set of measurements required to meet the users' needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurements are the geophysical products derived from satellite observations. In addition, the measurement gaps and user requirements were identified and defined by the ONION project (Table 1) [5,6], taking into account if, in the coming decade, the Copernicus and contributing missions satisfy the user requirements. This work focuses on the identification of the potential sensor technologies and platforms to meet those needs detected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%