2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34367.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Validated Grading Scale for Crow's Feet

Abstract: The 5-point photonumeric scale generated spans the severity of the type of crow's feet for which patients most commonly seek correction. The scale is well stratified for consistent rating.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
100
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
100
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the uniform distribution has an unambiguous definition with equal percentages of subjects across grades, making it straightforward to compare results across scales and across studies. For some scale reliability studies, this consideration can be addressed by preselecting subject images to ensure uniform distributions across scale grades5, 7, 8, 12, 16; this structure ensures that each grade in the scale is well represented, and the full range of the scale is utilized, explored, and evaluated, as desired in instrument design and testing 37. However, this structure may not be feasible for studies addressing multiple scales with different distributions.…”
Section: Impact Of Distribution Sample Size and Disagreements On Iccmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, the uniform distribution has an unambiguous definition with equal percentages of subjects across grades, making it straightforward to compare results across scales and across studies. For some scale reliability studies, this consideration can be addressed by preselecting subject images to ensure uniform distributions across scale grades5, 7, 8, 12, 16; this structure ensures that each grade in the scale is well represented, and the full range of the scale is utilized, explored, and evaluated, as desired in instrument design and testing 37. However, this structure may not be feasible for studies addressing multiple scales with different distributions.…”
Section: Impact Of Distribution Sample Size and Disagreements On Iccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scales that are a combination of phrases and photographs are known as photonumeric scales. In aesthetic studies, some examples of scales are measures for the degree of wrinkling,3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 lip fullness,9, 10, 11, 12 sagging,13 photodamage,14 and dyspigmentation,15 and they have been developed and evaluated using reliability indexes. In many aesthetic scale reliability studies, ICC is used to determine consistency, where a higher ICC signifies better consistency 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five types of marionette lines were investigated and classified as follows: Type Zero for absence of skin folds and visible solid lines; Type 1, type 2, type 3 and type 4, as the severity of the folds increased 22 , as shown in Figure 3. Five types of wrinkles were established in the analysis of the orbicularis lines, both at rest and smiling, ranging from Zero to 4, gradually 23 , according to their severity ( Figure 4). Symmetry: We compared the images of the individuals in our study to those found in the reference literature [21][22][23] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five types of wrinkles were established in the analysis of the orbicularis lines, both at rest and smiling, ranging from Zero to 4, gradually 23 , according to their severity ( Figure 4). Symmetry: We compared the images of the individuals in our study to those found in the reference literature [21][22][23] . The score zero was always standardized as the best condition for each of the evaluated aspects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation