2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Validated Forward Solution Dynamics Mathematical Model of the Knee Joint: Can It Be an Effective Alternative for Implant Evaluation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[47][48][49] These studies used motion analysis and ground reaction forces to calculate the forces and moments around the knee joint. Recently, new computer simulation studies with normal knee 50 and a PS TKA prothesis 51 have shown similar trends to previous findings, like the current study on MPK. However, in the current study, the lateral contact force and stress on the tibiofemoral joint at >60°of knee flexion were higher than those applied on the medial compartment in all three models.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…[47][48][49] These studies used motion analysis and ground reaction forces to calculate the forces and moments around the knee joint. Recently, new computer simulation studies with normal knee 50 and a PS TKA prothesis 51 have shown similar trends to previous findings, like the current study on MPK. However, in the current study, the lateral contact force and stress on the tibiofemoral joint at >60°of knee flexion were higher than those applied on the medial compartment in all three models.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Additionally, 90-day readmissions following TJA create an enormous national healthcare economic burden, with approximately half of the annual expenses attributed to readmissions unrelated to the TJA [11,12]. However, improvements in technique and implant positioning may mitigate the costs of revisions [13][14][15][16][17], which are responsible for the greatest readmission, post-acute care, and long-term expenses [12]. With the incidence of revision arthroplasties projected to increase over the next several decades [18,19], there is an impetus to continue optimizing techniques and technologies to reduce revision and readmission rates following primary TJA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mesh structure of the talus implant was designed using periodically repeated unit cells. Numerous mesh structures have been studied and veri ed in the literature, demonstrating that the structure, shape, and unit cell size signi cantly contribute to the mechanical performance of customized implants [9,18].…”
Section: The Structure Design Simulation and Mechanical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%