A universal register for animal names

Polaszek, Andrew

doi:10.1038/437477a

Cited by 104 publications

(62 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Th e key data fi les are published under the conditions of the OpenDataCommons license (ODbl) (http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/) All new species have been registered with Zoobank (Polaszek et al 2005). Th e concept of data publication and dissemination of interacative keys under the open access model is discussed in a forum paper published in the present issue ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Revision of the Oriental genera of Agathidinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) with an emphasis on Thailand and interactive keys to genera published in three different formats

Sharkey¹,

Yu²,

Noort³

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Th e genera of Oriental Agathidinae are revised and a fully illustrated dichotomous key is presented. New generic concepts are proposed for Bassus Fabricius, 1804 and Hypsostypos Baltazar, 1963. Bassus is restricted to a clade with an Old World distribution and the remaining members are divided amongst the resurrected genera Camptothlipsis Enderlein, 1920, Lytopylus FÖrster, 1862, and Th erophilus Wesmael, 1837. Th e concept of Hypsostypos is restricted and the new genus Amputostypos Sharkey, gen. n. is proposed to include species formerly included in Hypsostypos that do not have raised antennal bases. Troticus Brullé, 1846 is reported from the Oriental region for the fi rst time. Eighteen genera are recognized for Th ailand and neighboring areas, i.e

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Revision of the Oriental genera of Agathidinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) with an emphasis on Thailand and interactive keys to genera published in three different formats

Sharkey¹,

Yu²,

Noort³

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Experience with ZooBank [24] shows that embedding duplicate detection procedures in the data input process that require intellectual input alienates users. To foster contribution, other platforms completely waive respective measures.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is because, to maintain data quality, and to keep the rate of duplicates low in particular, many platforms include interactive duplicate detection procedures in the data upload process, i.e., no full automation. An example of such a platform is ZooBank [24]. Pursuing comprehensiveness, other platforms strip all data quality assurance measures from the upload process to simplify contributing, for instance the Catalogue of Life [4] and RefBank [27].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

RefConcile – Automated Online Reconciliation of Bibliographic References

Sautter

Böhm

King

2013

Digital Libraries: Social Media and Community Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract.Comprehensive bibliographies often rely on community contributions. In such settings, de-duplication is mandatory for the bibliography to be useful. Ideally, de-duplication works online, i.e., when adding new references, so the bibliography remains duplicate-free at all times. While de-duplication is well researched, generic approaches do not achieve the result quality required for automated reconciliation. To overcome this problem, we propose a new duplicate detection and reconciliation technique called RefConcile. Aiming specifically at bibliographic references, it uses dedicated blocking and matching techniques tailored to this type of data. Our evaluation based on a large realworld collection of bibliographic references shows that RefConcile scales well, and that it detects and reconciles duplicates highly accurately.

show abstract

“…ZooBank (zoobank.org), the official registry of zoological nomenclature, was first proposed in 2005 (Polaszek et al, 2005). It was initially launched on 1 January 2008, and continues to grow and evolve (Polaszek et al, 2008;Pyle & Michel, 2008, 2009, 2010Krell & Pyle, 2010).…”

Section: What Is Registration?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Electronic publications need registration in ZooBank to be available

Krell¹,

Pape²

2015

The Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The 2012 Amendment to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature allows electronic publication for nomenclatural purposes if certain requirements are fulfilled. We here explain these simple requirements, including what needs to be registered in ZooBank and when, which version of an electronic work is potentially Code-compliant (only the final, immutable version), and what is the correct date of publication (that of the final, immutable version; pre-final versions posted online are preliminary and as such always unavailable). We advise registration in ZooBank of publications that are issued in both electronic and paper version to secure the nomenclatural priority of the generally earlier electronic version. Failure to update a ZooBank record after publication will not have any impact on availability under the Code but will keep the registered information hidden from public view. Publishers may want to consider automated registration as an integral part of the publishing process; this has already been shown to be feasible and would ease the burden of manual registration for editors and authors.

show abstract

A universal register for animal names

Cited by 104 publications

References 0 publications

Revision of the Oriental genera of Agathidinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) with an emphasis on Thailand and interactive keys to genera published in three different formats

Revision of the Oriental genera of Agathidinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) with an emphasis on Thailand and interactive keys to genera published in three different formats

RefConcile – Automated Online Reconciliation of Bibliographic References

Electronic publications need registration in ZooBank to be available

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About