A unified flight phase and event model for the analysis of heterogeneous ATM simulations

Abstract

The research activities of the DLR Institute of Flight Guidance include validation and verification of new systems and procedures, such as airport infrastructure, routes, or assistance systems for air traffic controllers and pilots. Research is supported by a number of different simulation environments. Real-time simulators (RTS) like the Apron and Tower Simulator or the Air Traffic Management and Operations Simulator, as well as several fast-time simulation (FTS) tools focus on different parts of air traffic and help to examine various aspects of the air traffic environment (e.g. controller view, pilot view, general traffic situation, etc.). The utilization of all simulation systems in the Institute of Flight Guidance is focused on scientific research, and thus significant effort is placed in the analysis of simulation results. To support this task, the Institute of Flight Guidance has implemented the software system Extensible Workflow Management for Simulations (EWMS) for simulation process and data management. EWMS supports most of the simulation environments used within the institute, and provides generic reporting algorithms independent of the simulation system used. As the different simulation environments use a wide range of output data types and formats, the simulated flight trajectories have to be converted into one common format for subsequent analysis using the generic algorithms built into EWMS. Therefore, a unified description of flight phases and flight events was developed based on the CAST/ICAO Common Taxonomy Team (CICTT) Phase of Flight Definitions (see Stepens and de Kock in Phase of flight definitions and usage notes, CAST/ICAO Common Taxonomy Team, Version 1.0.2, 2010) as well as flight event definitions from the EUROCONTROL CDM Implementation Manual (see Lagios in Airport CDM implementation manual, 2006), and taking into account the flight phase and event models of different simulation environments. A survey of the simulation environments used in the institute resulted in an initial set of flight phases that could be generated by the different simulators. These flight phases were mapped onto the CAST/ICAO definitions, and extensions were made where the CAST/ICAO model offered no corresponding flight phase. Conditions for each phase of flight (e.g., departure boarding, taxi to runway, initial climb, etc.) were documented. Similarly, conditions for the different flight events (e.g., estimated and actual landing time, estimated and actual in-block-time, etc.) and their relation to flight phase boundaries were defined and documented. The resulting unified flight phase and event model was validated through interviews with ATM and simulation experts, air traffic controllers, flight test engineers and pilots. Finally, the model was implemented within the EWMS parsers for the simulation-specific data files. To account for the different capabilities of different simulation environments, the model offers several levels of detail for the individual flight phases, e.g., where one environment may simply...

Looking into the Crystal Ball—How Automated Fast-Time Simulation Can Support Probabilistic Airport Management Decisions

“…A sufficient state model for what-if applications could not be retrieved. Although multiple state models for flight description do exist (e.g., [8,9]), none have been adapted for comparable operations with the other models or had sufficient documentation for the comparison. As such, the state model was left for future work.…”

Operational and Environmental Assessment of Electric Taxi Based on Fast-Time Simulation

“…To postprocess the output from the simulation, which consists of several files containing information on aircraft movements, mission details, use of resources, and so forth, an in-house-developed program, Extensible Workflow Management for Simulation (EWMS), is used. Its special feature is that the user can postprocess data from various sources and tools, which after being imported to the generic internal format, are assessed with the same algorithms and presented to the user in common reports (19). For emissions calculations EWMS uses the ICAO engine data bank, Issue 16, 05.02.2009.…”

Determination and visualization of uncertainties in 4D-trajectory prediction

“…During the preparation of the study we picked a set of frameworks, like Google Chart Tool 1 , JFreeChart 2 , VisIt 3 , GeoTools 4 , NASA World Wind 5 or ArcGIS 6 , that seemed to be convenient and investigated their features. As it turned out JFreeChart and NASA World Wind are the toolkits with the best documented java interfaces and opportunities for uncertainty imaging as well.…”

“…To be able to evaluate the simulations, we developed a method to calculate and visualize the uncertainty in trajectory prediction. The concept is implemented as a tool into DLR's evaluation environment "Extensible Workflow Management for Simulations" (EWMS) [6] and validated using simulation scenarios. The software system described in this paper is an extension to the reporting suite EWMS.…”

“…The software system described in this paper is an extension to the reporting suite EWMS. The EWMS-Software was developed to streamline and simplify simulation data management, significantly to reduce the effort required to analyze simulation results, and provides a large number of validated analysis algorithms [6].…”