2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A typology of brand counterfeiting and imitation based on a semiotic approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The symbolic and experiential value of luxury brands attracts counterfeit production (Le Roux, Bobrie, & Thébault, 2016). A considerable amount of research has focused on issues of supplying counterfeits to MALIK ET AL.…”
Section: Purchase Intention Of Counterfeitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The symbolic and experiential value of luxury brands attracts counterfeit production (Le Roux, Bobrie, & Thébault, 2016). A considerable amount of research has focused on issues of supplying counterfeits to MALIK ET AL.…”
Section: Purchase Intention Of Counterfeitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their findings showed that when consumers feel uncertain about the quality of the products, copycats are liked more, when people are in uncertain conditions as being in a foreign country they prefer copycat in coffee category but not for energy drink. Similar to Van Horen and Pieters (), Le Roux, Bobrie, and Thébault () stressed the role of brand name and product design on counterfeit purchase intention in three categories (e.g., spirits, perfumes, electronics) with a conjoint analysis. Based on the extent of similarity of the imitation product to original brand in terms of its design and its brand name, the authors defined nine categories.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Several studies explained counterfeit consumption with product and brand-based motives. Perceived quality (Chaudhry & Stumpf, 2011;Poddar et al, 2012) and identical qualifications of counterfeit product increase the likelihood of its preference (Gentry et al, 2001;Le Roux et al, 2016;Van Horen & Pieters, 2012) as well as the gap between the prices of counterfeit and genuine brands (Poddar et al, 2012). Lai and Zaichkowsky (1999) argued that brand awareness of genuine brand also affects the choice of counterfeit.…”
Section: Proliferated Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a protection form for intellectual property, attaining from brand imitation to the subtle copy that can confuse the consumer. It is about colors, shapes, packaging, labels, among others (LE ROUX; BOBRIE; THÉBAULT, 2016). The product analyzed is called Mr.…”
Section: Persuasion With Greenwashing and Trade Dressmentioning
confidence: 99%