2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2006.00969.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two‐year prospective study of coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft

Abstract: ADM may reduce the residual gingival recession observed after 24 months in defects treated with coronally positioned flap. In addition, a greater gingival thickness may be achieved when the graft is used.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
97
3
14

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
97
3
14
Order By: Relevance
“…This result was not predictable, considering that most cases had Class III gingival recession at baseline. However, interesting results were recently reported with the use of the ADMG for the treatment of gingival recessions 17,18,29 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result was not predictable, considering that most cases had Class III gingival recession at baseline. However, interesting results were recently reported with the use of the ADMG for the treatment of gingival recessions 17,18,29 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acellular dermal matrix graft (ADMG) 16–19 has been widely used as a substitute for autogenous grafts in mucogingival surgeries, although it was originally developed for the treatment of full‐thickness burn wounds. This allograft is aseptically obtained from human donor skin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por lo tanto el uso de la MDA empleando la técnica de sobre en recesiones múlti-ples puede ser una alternativa viable a la técnica tradicional con injerto conectivo especialmente y se debe considerar en pacientes con limitaciones de tejido conectivo (9). De igual forma el uso de MDA reduce la RG y logra un mayor espesor gingival con la técnica de CDC (22,23), con resultados mejor a corto plazo (14) en recesiones de Miller clases I y II en dientes individuales a los 6 meses (9).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Two distinct sets of comparisons were found: CAF with ADM versus CAF with CTG in six studies [18][19][20][21][22]26], and CAF with ADM versus CAF alone in four studies [23][24][25]27]. Two studies used a parallel-group design, and six studies employed split-mouth models.…”
Section: Characteristics and Quality Assessment Of The Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%