2020
DOI: 10.3390/ma13153315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Two-Year Evaluation of Corrosion-Induced Damage to Hot Galvanized Reinforcing Steel B500SP in Chloride Contaminated Concrete

Abstract: Corrosion-induced damage to concrete reinforced with bars is a serious problem regarding technical and economic aspects and strongly depends on used materials, corrosion environment, and service life. Tests described in this paper refer to a two-year evaluation of the effectiveness of protection provided by zinc-coated low-carbon reinforcing steel of grade B500SP in concrete against chloride corrosion. Performed tests were comparative and included measurements conducted on four groups of concrete test elements… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, research is constantly being carried out to maximize the protection of steel bars against corrosion or to assess the possibility of replacing black steel with more corrosion-resistant reinforcement. The effectiveness of reinforcement made of galvanized steel is tested [ 6 ], including in an aggressive chloride environment [ 7 , 8 ]. Experimental tests also concern specimens and elements of the structures in which steel bars are replaced with a non-metallic reinforcement made of glass fiber (GFRP) [ 9 , 10 ], carbon (CFRP) [ 11 ], basalt [ 12 ] or even aramid (AFRP) [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this reason, research is constantly being carried out to maximize the protection of steel bars against corrosion or to assess the possibility of replacing black steel with more corrosion-resistant reinforcement. The effectiveness of reinforcement made of galvanized steel is tested [ 6 ], including in an aggressive chloride environment [ 7 , 8 ]. Experimental tests also concern specimens and elements of the structures in which steel bars are replaced with a non-metallic reinforcement made of glass fiber (GFRP) [ 9 , 10 ], carbon (CFRP) [ 11 ], basalt [ 12 ] or even aramid (AFRP) [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conducted tests prove the effectiveness of the use of alternative forms of reinforcement in order to reduce corrosion in concrete elements. However, at the same time, the authors point to other problems, e.g., related to the limited adhesion of rods to concrete [ 7 , 11 ], a different (rapid, uncontrolled) damage mechanism of elements in which such reinforcement was used [ 11 , 13 ], the difficult workability of the concrete mix with the addition of fibres [ 14 , 15 ], high performance requirements [ 7 , 8 ] or the high cost of such reinforcement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…100 µm in thickness. The detailed analysis of the quality of the zinc coating on ribbed rebars of the same batch and made of steel grade B500SP is presented in the paper [ 38 ]. It also includes the effects of chloride-induced degradation of the coating.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45° with reference to the axis of the reinforcement [ 31 , 34 ]. It should be emphasized that hot-dip galvanization usually generates a thicker layer of zinc in the ribbed area, which can slightly affect the inclination of the ribs [ 38 ]. Then, a small change in the stress values f b can be noticed compared to the rebar without zinc coating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open circuit potential (OCP) and tafel polarization revealed that the rebars were in passive state. Remarkable corrosion performance in severe chloride contamination was also seen over a period of 2 years [44]. Nevertheless, porosity of concrete increased due to the formation of hydrogen during reaction of zinc coating with fresh cement during the initial stages [45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%