1988
DOI: 10.1109/19.7466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two-way time transfer experiment via ECS-1 using the MITREX modem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have currently no explanation why the pattern of the individual data is so different between sites, but it was found to be to some extent reproducible [16,17,18]. Only in the very first campaign (E1), SD values of 0.1 ns to 0.3 ns were achieved, but the number of samples was quite small (only two to six data points were averaged) [9]. Here with some probability environmental effects could come into play, and some considerations on that are given in Section 5.…”
Section: Results Obtained During the Campaignmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have currently no explanation why the pattern of the individual data is so different between sites, but it was found to be to some extent reproducible [16,17,18]. Only in the very first campaign (E1), SD values of 0.1 ns to 0.3 ns were achieved, but the number of samples was quite small (only two to six data points were averaged) [9]. Here with some probability environmental effects could come into play, and some considerations on that are given in Section 5.…”
Section: Results Obtained During the Campaignmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference E1 1997 TUG, DTAG, PTB [9] T1 2002 USNO, PTB [11] T2 2003 USNO, PTB [13] E2 2003 IEN, PTB [16] E3 2004 PTB, VSL, OP, NPL [17] T3 2004 USNO, PTB [14] T4 2004 USNO, PTB [14] T5 2005 USNO, PTB [14] E4 2005 PTB, SP, VSL, NPL, OP, INRIM [18] T6 2006 USNO, PTB [15] E5 2006 TUG, PTB, METAS [19] T7 2007 USNO, PTB -T8 2007 USNO, PTB -…”
Section: No Year Participating Institutesmentioning
confidence: 99%