2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-10665-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two-step approach for arsenic removal by exploiting an autochthonous Delftia sp. BAs29 and neutralized red mud

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Primarily, arsenic contamination is caused by the usage of phosphate fertilizers, insecticides, smelting, and mining operations that release arsenic into groundwater and soil leading to severe environmental issues [112]. Water contaminated with arsenic poses a major threat to human health and aquatic organisms in numerous regions of the world [4]. Both ground and surface water contain arsenic contamination that in turn affects human health and aquatic organisms worldwide.…”
Section: Arsenic As a Contaminantmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Primarily, arsenic contamination is caused by the usage of phosphate fertilizers, insecticides, smelting, and mining operations that release arsenic into groundwater and soil leading to severe environmental issues [112]. Water contaminated with arsenic poses a major threat to human health and aquatic organisms in numerous regions of the world [4]. Both ground and surface water contain arsenic contamination that in turn affects human health and aquatic organisms worldwide.…”
Section: Arsenic As a Contaminantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adsorption capacities were found to be 121.5 for As(III) and 80.0 mgg −1 for As(V) at pH 7. Generally, water contains other ions like Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , PO 4 3− , etc., and there is a chance of interference from these ions during adsorption, resulting in a decreased adsorption efficiency. However, these ions didn't show any interference to affect the removal efficiency and selectivity of arsenic for this hybrid MOF.…”
Section: Metal Organic Framework As An Adsorbentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is worth noting that raw red mud has lower arsenic adsorption capacity compared to modified red mud or synthesized iron oxides/hydroxides as adsorbents. Numerous researchers have reported using modified red mud to successfully remove arsenic from an aqueous solution. Recently, Xu et al reported arsenic removal from aqueous solution using porous red mud beads …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%