2018
DOI: 10.1002/nme.5993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two‐scale FE‐FFT approach to nonlinear magneto‐elasticity

Abstract: Fourier-based approaches are a well-established class of methods for the theoretical and computational characterization of microheterogeneous materials.Driven by the advent of computational homogenization techniques, Fourier schemes gained additional momentum over the past decade. In recent contributions, the interpretation of Green operators central to Fourier solvers as projections opened up a new perspective. Based on such a viewpoint, the present work addresses a multiscale framework for magneto-mechanical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a regular grid in the components of F might lead to a prohibitively large amount of samples, and even to a violation of (39). For instance, such a grid with a rather moderate resolution of just 10 samples of each component would require 1 billion solutions of the FOM.…”
Section: Large Strain Sampling Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, a regular grid in the components of F might lead to a prohibitively large amount of samples, and even to a violation of (39). For instance, such a grid with a rather moderate resolution of just 10 samples of each component would require 1 billion solutions of the FOM.…”
Section: Large Strain Sampling Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assembly of the FE residual and of the FE stiffness depend on N qp . Future research should aim at an application of the introduced Reduced Basis method within realistic two-scale simulations, in analog to [12,[38][39][40]. Hyperreduction methods, cf.…”
Section: Advantages Compared To General Displacement-based Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following, the procedure according to [ 42 , 68 ], where a macro-continuum model is calibrated from micro-continuum simulations for the simplified two-dimensional case, is briefly presented. The framework represents a decoupled multiscale scheme which—in contrast to, e.g., FE -approaches [ 39 , 45 ]—can only account for microstructural evolution within the limits of the model calibration. Since isotropic MAEs are considered, it is sufficient to describe the macroscopic behavior by the averaged principal stretches and the three additional magneto-mechanical invariants …”
Section: Micro-modeling Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this yields a system of fully coupled, nonlinear partial differential equations which require computationally demanding numerical methods—such as a finite element (FE) analysis—for their solution, only comparably small MAE samples as well as representative microstructures in the surrounding of a material point can be considered. To this end, the approach allows for identifying mechanisms leading to magnetically induced deformations and enhanced mechanical moduli on the microstructural level but requires an appropriate computational homogenization procedure to predict the effective material behavior [ 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]. In macro-continuum approaches, the MAE is modeled as a homogeneous continuum in which microstructural information are captured via suitable coupling terms; see Figure 1 c. Here, a phenomenological material model is typically fitted to data obtained from experiments [ 40 , 41 ] or more resolved, microscopic analyses [ 42 , 43 , 44 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, the method did not require a set of reference mediums. It has been lately applied to computational homogenization for electroelastically and magnetoelastically coupled materials in Göküzüm et al 30 and Rambausek et al, 31 respectively. These contributions employed a technique of computing the constitutive tangent introduced by Göküzüm and Keip 32 based on the fluctuation sensitivitiesf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%