A twin rhizospheric bacterial consortium induces systemic resistance to a phytopathogen Macrophomina phaseolina in mung bean

Sharma, Chankee Kumar; Vishnoi, Vineet Kumar; Dubey, Ramesh Chandra; Maheshwari, Dinesh Kumar

doi:10.1016/j.rhisph.2018.01.001

Cited by 64 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A literature survey revealed an increasing number of examples where plant inoculation with compatible strains' mixtures of P. fluorescens and plant mutualistic bacteria (Sundaramoorthy and Balabaskar, 2012;Sundaramoorthy and Balabaskar, 2013;Rathi et al, 2015;Kumar et al, 2016;Sharma et al, 2018) or benefi cial fungi including species of Trichoderma (Thilagavathi et al, 2007, Jain et al, 2012Singh et al, 2013aSingh et al, , 2013bSingh et al, , 2014Ruano-Rosa et al, 2014;Thakkar and Saraf, 2015;Chemelrotit et al, 2017;Patel et al, 2017;Yadav et al, 2017;Jambhulkar et al, 2018), Beauveria (Karthiba et al, 2010;Senthilraja et al, 2013), Pochonia (Siddiqui et al, 2003) and Clonostachys (Karlsson et al, 2015) showed better results than inoculation with individual strains or control treatment, under controlled and fi eld conditions. Furthermore, co-inoculation of specifi c Pseudomonas strains that function as mycorrhiza helper bacteria (MHB) in combination with various arbuscular mucorrhiza fungi (AMF) promoted the growth of maize plants in fi eld conditions better than single AM inoculation (Berta et al, 2014).…”

Section: Pseudomonas-based Multistrain Mixturesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multistrain versus single-strain plant growth promoting microbial inoculants - The compatibility issue

Thomloudi

Tsalgatidou

Douka

et al. 2019

Hellenic Plant Protection Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Plant Growth Promoting Microorganisms or Plant Probiotics (PGPMs) constitute a promising solution for agricultural sustainability. The concept that inoculation of PGPM mixtures may perform better in enhancing agricultural production than single strain application dates back to the discovery of plant growth rhizobacteria (PGPR) and is gaining ground in our days. This shift is highlighted by the increasing number of research publications dealing with the positive impact of microbial mixtures in promoting plant growth, controlling plant pathogens, as well as providing abiotic stress tolerance. The continuous deposition of patents as well as commercially available formulations concerning bioprotective and/or biostimulant multistrain mixtures also underlines this shift. A major issue in engineering an effective and consistent synthetic multistrain mixture appears to be the compatibility of its components. The present review provides a thorough literature survey supporting the view that treatment of plants with compatible multistrain mixtures generally exerts a better effect in plant growth and health than single-strain inoculation. Our study focuses on multistrain mixtures based on Pseudomonas, Bacillus and beneficial fungal strains, while commercial products are also being referred.

show abstract

Section: Pseudomonas-based Multistrain Mixturesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multistrain versus single-strain plant growth promoting microbial inoculants - The compatibility issue

Thomloudi

Tsalgatidou

Douka

et al. 2019

Hellenic Plant Protection Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Bacteria primarily produce chitinases in order to degrade chitin for its utilization as an energy source, whereas some bacterial chitinases have shown potentiality as biological control agents against a variety of plant diseases caused by phytopathogenic fungi [45][46][47]. Fungal chitinases have also been observed to play a key role in the nutrition, morphogenesis, and developmental processes in fungi [48]. The later sections of this review describe the role of fungi in plant pathogenicity and their mode of action, followed by the state-of-the-art information of the research conducted related to the application of chitinases in agriculture.…”

Section: Chitinases From Microorganismsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Chitinases—Potential Candidates for Enhanced Plant Resistance towards Fungal Pathogens

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Crop cultivation is crucial for the existence of human beings, as it fulfills our nutritional requirements. Crops and other plants are always at a high risk of being attacked by phytopathogens, especially pathogenic fungi. Although plants have a well-developed defense system, it can be compromised during pathogen attack. Chitinases can enhance the plant's defense system as they act on chitin, a major component of the cell wall of pathogenic fungi, and render the fungi inactive without any negative impact on the plants. Along with strengthening plant defense mechanisms, chitinases also improve plant growth and yield. Chitinases in combination with recombinant technology can be a promising tool for improving plant resistance to fungal diseases. The applicability of chitinase-derived oligomeric products of chitin further augment chitinase prospecting to enhance plant defense and growth.

show abstract

“…Moreover, induced systemic resistance (ISR), potentiated by numerous strains of nonpathogenic microorganisms such as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), is another route to boost the broad-spectrum immunity in plants [93,99,100]. Many studies have shown the efficacy of PGPR to induce ISR such as in tomato to defend Phelipanche aegyptiaca [101] and Pseudomonas syringae [102]; cotton against Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) [71]; tobacco to resist Tobacco mosaic virus [103]; mung bean to protect against Macrophomina phaseolina [104]; rice against Xanthomonas campestris [105]; and tomato to defend Ralstonia solanacearum [106]. erefore, research on the induction of disease resistance using biotic and abiotic inducers is desirable and can be regarded as one of the effective approaches to FBG management.…”

Section: Biotic and Abiotic Stresses Induced Host Defensementioning

confidence: 99%

Faba Bean Gall (Olpidium viciae K.) as a Priority Biosecurity Threat for Producing Faba Bean in Ethiopia: Current Status and Future Perspectives

Meresa

Gebremedhin

2020

International Journal of Agronomy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The diploid cool-season legume species, faba bean (Vicia faba L.), is one of the vital pulses for the people in the world as it maintains the sustainability of agriculture and provides nutrient-rich grains. Biotic and abiotic stresses are, however, challenging the faba bean production in many countries. The foliar diseases of faba bean are among the major constraints for the production and productivity of faba bean. Recently, a new foliar disease “Faba bean gall” caused by plant debris and soil-borne pathogen (Olpidium viciae K.) is rapidly spreading and causing high yield losses in Ethiopia. This review paper presents the distribution, impact, epidemiology, and biology of faba bean gall pathogen and principally illustrates how the application and investigation of the various diseases’ management approaches such as avoiding crop residues, crop rotation, intercropping, use of elicitors to induce host resistance, use of resistant genotypes, bioagents, compost teas, plant extracts, and lastly use of chemical fungicides could be important to control the faba bean gall disease underlying in faba bean.

show abstract

A twin rhizospheric bacterial consortium induces systemic resistance to a phytopathogen Macrophomina phaseolina in mung bean

Cited by 64 publications

References 16 publications

Multistrain versus single-strain plant growth promoting microbial inoculants - The compatibility issue

Multistrain versus single-strain plant growth promoting microbial inoculants - The compatibility issue

Chitinases—Potential Candidates for Enhanced Plant Resistance towards Fungal Pathogens

Faba Bean Gall (Olpidium viciae K.) as a Priority Biosecurity Threat for Producing Faba Bean in Ethiopia: Current Status and Future Perspectives

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About