2012
DOI: 10.1186/1742-7622-9-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A tutorial in estimating the prevalence of disease in humans and animals in the absence of a gold standard diagnostic

Abstract: Epidemiological methods for estimating disease prevalence in humans and other animals in the absence of a gold standard diagnostic test are well established. Despite this, reporting apparent prevalence is still standard practice in public health studies and disease control programmes, even though apparent prevalence may differ greatly from the true prevalence of disease. Methods for estimating true prevalence are summarized and reviewed. A computing appendix is also provided which contains a brief guide in how… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
63
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(55 reference statements)
1
63
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For a detailed model description, see Lewis and Torgerson (2012). Diagnostic Se was defined as the probability that a test would correctly classify true positive samples; diagnostic Sp was defined as the probability that a test would correctly classify true negative samples.…”
Section: Bayesian Latent Class Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a detailed model description, see Lewis and Torgerson (2012). Diagnostic Se was defined as the probability that a test would correctly classify true positive samples; diagnostic Sp was defined as the probability that a test would correctly classify true negative samples.…”
Section: Bayesian Latent Class Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For BC, we used the categories "all pathogens" and "major pathogens" (Table 1) to account for the dependence of Se and Sp on defining a positive culture Reyher and Dohoo, 2011). We investigated 2 basic latent class models and used initial analyses with non-informative priors as β distributions (1,1) for all parameters of both models, as described by Lewis and Torgerson (2012). We set thresholds for SCC and MAA-ELISA at 100,000 cells/mL and at 1 µg/mL, respectively, for both models.…”
Section: Bayesian Latent Class Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assim, a estimativa precisa da prevalência é essencial tanto em saúde pública humana, quanto veterinária (Lewis & Torgerson 2012). O desempenho de um teste de diagnóstico é geralmente representado por duas medidas: a sensibilidade (SE) e a especificidade (SP), cada uma descrevendo a capacidade do teste, de modo a refletir o verdadeiro e desconhecido "estado da doença" (Speybroeck et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Da mesma forma, a especificidade é a probabilidade de um teste de diagnóstico ser negativo, dado que a amostra a ser testada é certamente negativa (Lewis & Torgerson 2012). Infelizmente, SE e SP são raramente conhecidas exatamente e devem ser calculadas a partir de dados.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation