2015
DOI: 10.14687/ijhs.v12i1.3144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Turkish adaptation of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire

Abstract: <p>This study aimed to adapt the Emotional Regulation Questionnaire into Turkish and investigate its validity and reliability. The Turkish version of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire was administered to 442 university students. Firstly, language equivalence of the Turkish version the Emotional Regulation Questionnaire was investigated and findings indicated that the Turkish translation of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire is equivalent to the original form. Confirmatory factor analyses successfull… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
20
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(30 reference statements)
6
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…), answered on a seven-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 7 (Strongly agree). As indicated previously, its psychometric parameters have been adequate in other cultural contexts (Cabello, Salguero, Fernández-Berrocal, & Gross, 2013;Eldeleklioğlu & Eroğlu, 2015;Yoshizu, Sekiguchi, & Amemiya, 2013), with evidences in Brazil that it works with the elderly (Batistoni et al, 2013). High scores on one of its factors indicate a greater propensity to use that strategy of emotional regulation.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…), answered on a seven-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 7 (Strongly agree). As indicated previously, its psychometric parameters have been adequate in other cultural contexts (Cabello, Salguero, Fernández-Berrocal, & Gross, 2013;Eldeleklioğlu & Eroğlu, 2015;Yoshizu, Sekiguchi, & Amemiya, 2013), with evidences in Brazil that it works with the elderly (Batistoni et al, 2013). High scores on one of its factors indicate a greater propensity to use that strategy of emotional regulation.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…It is worth mentioning that this instrument has been used in different contexts internationally, showing good psychometric parameters. Eldeleklioğlu and Eroğlu (2015), seeking evidence of validity of this measure for the Turkish context, verified that it has an internal consistency index of 0.78 and 0.73 for the Cognitive Reassessment and Emotional Suppression factors, respectively. Regarding the model's indices of adequacy to the data, the study showed CFI = 0.98, GFI = 0.99 and RMSEA = 0.06.…”
Section: Emotion Regulation Questionnairementioning
confidence: 83%
“…Gross and John (2003) developed an Emotion Regulation Questionnaire to assess the habitual use of suppression (as a response-focused ER strategy) and reappraisal (as an antecedent-focused ER strategy). The Turkish adaptation of the scale was carried out by Eldeleklioğlu and Eroğlu (2015). The scale consists of 10 items.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High scores obtained from each sub-factor indicate that emotion regulation strategy has been used in that factor. The scale was adapted to Turkish by Eldeleklioğlu and Eroğlu (2015). The internal consistency coefficient of each subscale was .78 for reevaluation and .73 for concealment, respectively; test retest reliability for reevaluation is .74 and .72 for concealment.…”
Section: Emotion Regulation Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…High scores obtained from each sub-factor indicate that emotion regulation strategy has been used in that factor. The scale was adapted to Turkish by Eldeleklioğlu and Eroğlu (2015).…”
Section: Emotion Regulation Scalementioning
confidence: 99%