2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.10.093
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Tumor-Specific Super-Enhancer Drives Immune Evasion by Guiding Synchronous Expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2

Abstract: Highlights d Synchronous expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 is dependent on super-enhancers d The PD-L1L2-SE is a super-enhancer located between the genes encoding PD-L1 and PD-L2 d PD-L1L2-SE mediates immune evasion by driving PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression d The activation of PD-L1L2-SE associates with PD-L1 and PD-L2 in cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in the figure, the expression on PC-9 cells was relatively much higher than that on MCF-7 cells. Therefore, we used PC-9 cells as model cancer cells expressing PD-L1 molecules (PD-L1 + ) and MCF-7 as those not expressing PD-L1 (PD-L1 − ), which was also consistent with a previous report [ 29 ]. In this study, the intercellular adhesion forces between a PD-L1 + cell and the two T cells (PD-1 high and PD-1 low ) were mainly measured to evaluate the contribution of PD-1/PD-L1 interactions to intercellular adhesion strengths between T cells and cancer cells, and the influence of nivolumab on adhesion strength was evaluated.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…As shown in the figure, the expression on PC-9 cells was relatively much higher than that on MCF-7 cells. Therefore, we used PC-9 cells as model cancer cells expressing PD-L1 molecules (PD-L1 + ) and MCF-7 as those not expressing PD-L1 (PD-L1 − ), which was also consistent with a previous report [ 29 ]. In this study, the intercellular adhesion forces between a PD-L1 + cell and the two T cells (PD-1 high and PD-1 low ) were mainly measured to evaluate the contribution of PD-1/PD-L1 interactions to intercellular adhesion strengths between T cells and cancer cells, and the influence of nivolumab on adhesion strength was evaluated.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Also, some reports explored that the change of 9p24.1 could increase the high expression of PD-L1, because of 9q24.1 including many genes such as JAK2 and PDCD1LG2, which were closely related to PD-L1 expression [30]. Meanwhile, the latest research reported that the tumor-specific superenhancer in 9q24.1 could increase the expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 [31]. So these genes in 9q24.1 were changed by HPV-DNA integration, which may create some kind of effect to affect PD-L1 expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Chip Design and Order. We designed the sequencecapture probes according to 20 types of HPV genome (6,11,16,18,31,33,35,39,42,43,44,45,51,52,53,56,58,59, 66, and 68) sequences, and these probes were produced by Agilent Inc., USA. The enrichment chip was also ordered from Agilent Inc., USA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in PD-L1 expression due to 3′-UTR disruption is thought to interfere with post-transcriptional regulation such as miR-mediated control, resulting in a decreased mRNA decay rate [ 80 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 ]. A super-enhancer located between the PD-L1 and PD-L2 genes has recently been identified [ 99 ] and shown to maintain expression of PD-L1 independently of IFNγ. It is subject to epigenetic regulation and sensitized cancer cells to PD-1 blockade [ 99 ].…”
Section: Expression Of Pd-l1 By Tumor Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A super-enhancer located between the PD-L1 and PD-L2 genes has recently been identified [ 99 ] and shown to maintain expression of PD-L1 independently of IFNγ. It is subject to epigenetic regulation and sensitized cancer cells to PD-1 blockade [ 99 ].…”
Section: Expression Of Pd-l1 By Tumor Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%