2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijms21197139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and Temporal Changes in PD-L1 Expression in Cancer: The Role of Genetic Drivers, Tumor Microenvironment and Resistance to Therapy

Abstract: Immunotherapies blocking immune inhibitory receptors programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) on T-cells have dramatically improved patient outcomes in a range of advanced cancers. However, the lack of response, and the development of resistance remain major obstacles to long-term improvements in patient outcomes. There is significant interest in the clinical use of biomarkers to improve patient selection, and the expression of PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) is often repor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 180 publications
(260 reference statements)
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some studies suggest that PD-L1 expression is a negative prognostic factor, this is mainly due to the assessment of expression in tumor cells [ 33 , 58 , 59 ] and tumor staging. The contradictory results from the metastatic setting and from the early-stages [ 60 ] are probably due to temporal and spatial differences in the microenvironment and PD-L1 expression [ 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although some studies suggest that PD-L1 expression is a negative prognostic factor, this is mainly due to the assessment of expression in tumor cells [ 33 , 58 , 59 ] and tumor staging. The contradictory results from the metastatic setting and from the early-stages [ 60 ] are probably due to temporal and spatial differences in the microenvironment and PD-L1 expression [ 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to survival, patients in the CMS1 group, defined by dMMR, have the best prognosis in early-stage CRC [ 2 , 29 , 67 , 68 ] independent of the degree of PD-L1 expression. Further, the value of PD-L1 expression as an immunohistochemical biomarker of good prognosis when assessed in immune cells has been suggested by several studies and meta-analyses [ 33 , 47 , 63 , 69 ]. It is independent of MMR status [ 28 , 29 , 67 , 70 , 71 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale here is to re-direct the response towards CD4 T cells (with the use of anti-CTLA-4 helping attenuate Treg-mediated suppression), plus NK-targeting drugs (ICB or antibodies preventing NKG2DL shedding) to prevent hematogenic metastatic spread [281,282]. In this setting, therapeutic blockade of PD-L1 will help unleash the reactivity of PD-L1-expressing NK cells against MHC-I low tumors [290], while also improving antigen presentation in the tumor microenvironment [347]. This approach described in this section is suitable for tumors amenable to quantitative flow cytometry as described in [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumor-associated dendritic cells (DCs) upregulate PD-L1 in response to T-cell derived inflammatory cytokines like IFN-γ [ 80 ], while M1 macrophages do so in response to another inflammatory cytokine, interleukin (IL)-1β [ 81 ]. PD-L1 + DCs can lead to functional inactivation of T cells upon interaction with PD-1 [ 82 ]. Similarly, other PD-L1 + antigen-presenting cells like macrophages can induce anergy in T cells upon interaction with PD-1 [ 83 ], explaining why expression of PD-L1 on immune cells, rather than tumor cells, has been found in some studies to correlate with a favorable response to anti-PD-1 therapy [ 84 ].…”
Section: Why Non-depleting Antibodies Have Been Used Against Inhibitory Icpmlsmentioning
confidence: 99%