A triple bottom line balanced set of key performance indicators to measure the sustainability performance of industrial supply chains

A thermoeconomic indicator for the sustainable development with social considerations

“…Munda Kravchenko et al (2020). Furthermore, a large number of indicators for sustainable development have been proposed for specific sectors and aspects, such as concerns energy use, energy efficiency and exergy analysis (Hacatoglu et al 2015;Dincer and Acar 2015;Abu-Rayash and Dincer 2021;Sciubba 2013;Romero and Linares 2014;Sciubba 2019), circular economy Santagata et al 2020;Rossi et al 2020;Pascale et al 2021), industrial supply chains (Neri et al 2021) but also sustainability of biofuels production (Mayer et al 2020;, biomass-based carbon chemicals (Horváth et al 2017), agriculture (de Olde et al 2017; Janker and Mann 2020), emerging technologies (Açkkalp and Ahmadi 2018; Meramo-Hurtado and González-Delgado 2020), etc.. Moreover, the need to assess sustainability must be coupled with the requirement of decent standards of quality of life (Eras et al 2013) and human well-being.…”

Circular Economy Performance Measurement in Manufacturing Firms: A Systematic Literature Review with Insights for Small and Medium Enterprises and New Adopters

“…Adequate competences to tackle the specific aspect of interest [30][31][32]35] Maturity Level. Maturity level in terms of transition towards the specific aspect of interest [27,32,35] Such a categorization is relevant for properly understanding the needs of the different types of firms, and, as for the measurement of performance, reasoning on their specific characteristics [42,43]. An effective performance-measurement system should indeed allow for both a general and a tailored application, having flexibility as one of its main features, so as to adapt to a firm's continuous and dynamic evolution [18].…”

“…As for literature reviews, the following were highlighted: general information (authors, date, journal) and characteristics of the review (focus; timespan; database; number of papers included). The axes of analysis for literature reviews were selected so to better understand the focus of the selected contributions and identify areas that still need to be addressed with regards to the aim of the present work [43]. concerning original studies, the following were pinpointed: general information (authors, date, journal); theoretical development (context of development; methodology); indicators (number; categorization; sustainability pillars; prioritization; index); empirical application (context of application; methodology; sample/set).…”

“…concerning original studies, the following were pinpointed: general information (authors, date, journal); theoretical development (context of development; methodology); indicators (number; categorization; sustainability pillars; prioritization; index); empirical application (context of application; methodology; sample/set). the axes of analysis for original studies were selected to (i) characterize the performance-measurement systems according to features that emerged as interesting from the literature [43,58]; (ii) understand the context of development and application of the frameworks [59,60].…”

“…Competitiveness is increasingly played among industrial systems-as supply chains, industrial parks or industrial districts [18,84], rather than single firms [85,86]. Systems are pivotal for enhancing CE [2], so that a single firm's performance should be considered within the broader system in which it operates [4,43]. In the reviewed contributions, the micro and meso levels are separated, without an integrated micro-meso perspective.…”