Circular Economy Performance Measurement in Manufacturing Firms: A Systematic Literature Review with Insights for Small and Medium Enterprises and New Adopters

Abstract

The circular economy is a central and increasingly important topic within managerial and academic discourse. Although the circular economy could bring benefits to their performance, manufacturing firms still struggle with its adoption. As an effective adoption should pass for adequate performance measurement, the present study performs a systematic literature review to deepen the knowledge of circular economy performance-measurement systems for manufacturing firms, both from a general perspective and to provide specific insights for small–medium enterprises and new adopters. The results show the lack of an integrated, holistic, and scalable framework for measuring circular economy performance, and only a few and dispersed specific indications for small–medium enterprises and new adopters. Shortcomings of the extant literature are identified in terms of integration of the circular economy’s level, theoretical development and empirical application, characteristics of the indicators proposed, considerations of sustainability, holistic perspectives on industrial systems, and scalability to adapt to firms’ different characteristics. The study paves the way for further research while offering theoretical and practical implications.

Implementing and Monitoring Circular Business Models: An Analysis of Italian SMEs

“…By their very nature, SMEs are often characterized by undercapitalization, a lack of highly skilled staff and low investment in research and technological innovation [103][104][105][106]. SMEs are usually resource-constrained, in terms of time, staff, and economic resources, compared to larger companies, and they are less likely to undertake transformational changes; moreover, they often have poor awareness of their impact on stakeholders [107][108][109].…”

Resource management and performance measurement indicators in the circular economy

“…Numerous studies show variation in the number of indicators proposed as relevant for analysis -from one indicator up to 189, while most studies advocate the use of a smaller number of indicators that should not exceed a dozen indicators, relevant to the analysis of performance efficiency in circular economy (Negri et al, 2021). The framework for measuring the performance of the circular economy must be clearly defined to support the business of the organization in all phases of its transition from linear to circular business, and in all phases of development of resources, competencies and levels of awareness and knowledge of the concept of circular economy.…”

Circular economy performance measurements and blockchain technology: an examination of relationships

“…These issues and concerns serve as barriers to a CE and its practices. One way of addressing and managing these concerns is to be able to utilize performance measurement tools for a CE (Negri et al, 2021;Sassanelli et al, 2019). Performance measurement is necessary because the aphorism of "you cannot manage what you cannot measure" is especially pertinent to CE practices, their adoption, and longer-term management.…”

“…These issues and concerns serve as barriers to a CE and its practices. One way of addressing and managing these concerns is to be able to utilize performance measurement tools for a CE (Negri et al. , 2021; Sassanelli et al.…”