2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-016-3276-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Trend Analysis Method for IoT Technologies Using Patent Dataset with Goal and Approach Concepts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from a real IoT patent dataset revealed 98.6% expansion relations and 1.4% transition relations among ETI relations. The study also confirms that proposed dictionaries enhance accuracy in extracting ETI relations from patent networks automatically [15]. Han et al developed a unique interactive method, PatStream, for analyzing patent dataset trends.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Results from a real IoT patent dataset revealed 98.6% expansion relations and 1.4% transition relations among ETI relations. The study also confirms that proposed dictionaries enhance accuracy in extracting ETI relations from patent networks automatically [15]. Han et al developed a unique interactive method, PatStream, for analyzing patent dataset trends.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Jangwon et al [36] explored the role of technology trends in analyzing big data by utilizing patent data and machine learning. Their proposed method can be used to evaluate a target organization and devise strategies for their patented inventions.…”
Section: Existing Iot Research Effortsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este tipo de literatura se convierte en una fuente de información primaria para las organizaciones y para realizar análisis de las tendencias en campos particulares (Motta, Puccinelli, Reggiani y Saccone, 2016). Es decir que el Big Data se ha convertido en una herramienta de la inteligencia de negocio o Business Intelligence (BI) (Larson y Chang, 2016;Bondarev y Zakirov, 2015;Chianese, Marulli y Piccialli, 2016;Gim, Lee, Jang, Jeong y Jung, 2016;Lewis, Liaw y Ray, 2015;Mwilu, Comyn-Wattiau y Prat, 2015;Rady, 2015;Santos y Costa, 2016).…”
Section: Marco Teóricounclassified