2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A training process for improving the quality of software projects developed by a practitioner

Abstract: Background: The quality of a software product depends on the quality of the software process followed in developing the product. Therefore, many higher education institutions (HEI) and software organizations have implemented software process improvement (SPI) training courses to improve the software quality.Objective: Because the duration of a course is a concern for HEI and software organizations, we investigate whether the quality of software projects will be improved by reorganizing the activities of the te… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sudhaman and Thangavel (2015) stated that the success of an ERP system, which is a kind of software integration system, largely depends on the rigidity of the software quality process and maintains productivity balance and efficiency, while Lindsjørn et al (2016) noted the quality of teamwork as a software project success factor. Finally, López-Martín et al (2017) claim improving the software process improves the software project’s quality.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sudhaman and Thangavel (2015) stated that the success of an ERP system, which is a kind of software integration system, largely depends on the rigidity of the software quality process and maintains productivity balance and efficiency, while Lindsjørn et al (2016) noted the quality of teamwork as a software project success factor. Finally, López-Martín et al (2017) claim improving the software process improves the software project’s quality.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%