2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-009-0416-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A topology optimization method for design of negative permeability metamaterials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
74
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of method including homogenization method ( [3]), solid isotropic material with penalization (SIMP) method ( [4,8]), evolutionary structural optimization (ESO) method ( [6]), and its improved algorithm C bidirectional evolutionary structural optimization (BESO) method ( [9][10][11][12]) has tackled various problems, including uncertain design ( [13][14][15][16][17]), dynamic problems ( [18][19][20]), and designing metamaterials ( [21]). The aforementioned elementbased topology optimization methods have applications successfully in a number of fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of method including homogenization method ( [3]), solid isotropic material with penalization (SIMP) method ( [4,8]), evolutionary structural optimization (ESO) method ( [6]), and its improved algorithm C bidirectional evolutionary structural optimization (BESO) method ( [9][10][11][12]) has tackled various problems, including uncertain design ( [13][14][15][16][17]), dynamic problems ( [18][19][20]), and designing metamaterials ( [21]). The aforementioned elementbased topology optimization methods have applications successfully in a number of fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last decade, topology optimization has started to be applied to the design of various electromagnetic components, such as antennas (Nomura et al 2007;Erentok and Sigmund 2011;Zhou et al 2010;Aage 2011;Hassan et al 2014b), metamaterials (Diaz and Sigmund 2010;Otomori et al 2012), and filters (Kiziltas et al 2004;Nomura et al 2013;Aage and Egede Johansen 2017). As opposed to classical topology optimization approaches applied to elastic material, the layout optimization of conducting materials suffers from an ohmic barrier issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this complexity, physical intuitionbased electromagnetic structure design has its limitations. To overcome these bounds, several inverse design tests have been implemented based on structural optimization methods [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], in which the method employed most is the topology optimization method. Topology optimization is currently regarded to be the most robust methodology for the inverse determination of material distribution in structures that meet given structural performance criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%