2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.12.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A tool to predict suicidal ideation and behavior in bipolar disorder: The Concise Health Risk Tracking Self-Report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study analyzed for the first time the original structure of the CHRT‐SR 12 with its two subscales and one Total Score. Factor analysis results were similar to those previously reported (Ostacher et al., ; Reilly‐Harrington et al., ; Trivedi et al., ). Trivedi et al., initially reported a 3‐factor structure when testing the CHRT 12 in a sample of patients with MDD: hopelessness, perceived lack of social support, and suicidal thoughts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study analyzed for the first time the original structure of the CHRT‐SR 12 with its two subscales and one Total Score. Factor analysis results were similar to those previously reported (Ostacher et al., ; Reilly‐Harrington et al., ; Trivedi et al., ). Trivedi et al., initially reported a 3‐factor structure when testing the CHRT 12 in a sample of patients with MDD: hopelessness, perceived lack of social support, and suicidal thoughts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…() and Reilly‐Harrington et al. () reported a 3‐factor structure when working with a sample of bipolar outpatients, with the last testing a 14‐item version of the CHRT. Consistent with our findings, all previous analyses reported a Suicidal Thoughts factor comprised of the last three items of the scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…= 10.5) were higher than in prior CHRT studies in out-patients (mean = 23.7–25.3) (Ostacher et al . 2015; Reilly-Harrington et al . 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suicide risk assessment is challenging for several reasons. Conventional approaches to risk assessment, for example, suicidal risk scales (Linehan, Comtois, Brown, Heard, & Wagner, ; Nock, Holmberg, Photos, & Michel, ; Reilly‐Harrington et al., ) rely on patient's self‐reporting, but individuals who are truly suicidal often do not share that information. Besides, none of the suicidal risk scales have shown reliable efficiency in determining the suicidal risk, and few have been tested on their predictive ability for suicidal behavior (Roos, Sareen, & Bolton, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%