2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2021.115996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A time domain approach for shock noise prediction with decomposition analyses of large-scale coherent turbulent structures in jets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The velocity on the centerline of the subsonic jet decreases with the increase of Mach number, and the large-scale turbulent structure in the form of wave packets plays an important role in generating significant shallow angle noise radiation of the jet (Cavalieri et al , 2012; Prasad and Gaitonde, 2021), while the low-frequency jet noise is generated by unstable wave packets of the shear layer (Vk et al , 2020). Broadband shock-associated noise is one of the main components of supersonic jets and most noise sources are distributed at the interaction between shock and turbulence (Shen et al , 2021). Compared with the vortex jet, the swirling jet can eliminate the transonic noise (Balakrishnan and Srinivasan, 2017a, 2017b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The velocity on the centerline of the subsonic jet decreases with the increase of Mach number, and the large-scale turbulent structure in the form of wave packets plays an important role in generating significant shallow angle noise radiation of the jet (Cavalieri et al , 2012; Prasad and Gaitonde, 2021), while the low-frequency jet noise is generated by unstable wave packets of the shear layer (Vk et al , 2020). Broadband shock-associated noise is one of the main components of supersonic jets and most noise sources are distributed at the interaction between shock and turbulence (Shen et al , 2021). Compared with the vortex jet, the swirling jet can eliminate the transonic noise (Balakrishnan and Srinivasan, 2017a, 2017b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%