2020
DOI: 10.1177/1056789520924103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A time-dependent tensile constitutive model for long-fiber-reinforced unidirectional ceramic-matrix minicomposites considering interface and fiber oxidation

Abstract: In this paper, a time-dependent tensile constitutive model of long-fiber-reinforced unidirectional ceramic-matrix minicomposites is developed considering the interface and fiber oxidation. The relationship between the time-dependent tensile behavior and internal damage is established. The damage mechanisms of time-dependent matrix cracking, fiber/matrix interface debonding, fiber failure, and the oxidation of the interface and fiber are considered in the analysis of the time-dependent tensile stress–s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The followings are interface-relevant developments on this formula. In case of the fiber lateral surface debonding, an equilibrium condition in terms of debonding length is available in (Gao et al, 1988;Longbiao, 2020). By considering the effect of surrounding fibers, Fu et al (Fu et al, 2000) derived a multi-fiber pull-out model based on the shear-lag formulism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The followings are interface-relevant developments on this formula. In case of the fiber lateral surface debonding, an equilibrium condition in terms of debonding length is available in (Gao et al, 1988;Longbiao, 2020). By considering the effect of surrounding fibers, Fu et al (Fu et al, 2000) derived a multi-fiber pull-out model based on the shear-lag formulism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, stiffness prediction for an SFRC with debonded fiber end interface has attracted much less attention than that for a perfect bonding case, although the latter itself is not an easy job. The existing methods can be classified into Shear-Lag formula (Cox, 1952; Henry and Pimenta, 2018; Longbiao, 2020; Xiong et al., 2018), finite element approach (FEA) (Noda et al., 2020; Notta-Cuvier et al., 2015; Schneider et al., 2019; Shah et al., 2020; Tian et al., 2015), mean-field homogenization (Eshelby, 1957; Muller et al., 2016; Naili et al., 2020; Schemmann et al., 2018; Xu et al., 2022) and other models (Lancioni and Alessi, 2020; Lee, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%