Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures 2011
DOI: 10.1145/1989493.1989515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A tight runtime bound for synchronous gathering of autonomous robots with limited visibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, three models are commonly used: Fsync, Ssync, and Async; the fully synchronous model Fsync is the strongest, the asynchronous model Async is the weakest, and the semisynchronous model Ssync lies in between. In the synchronous models (Fsync and Ssync), the cycles of all robots are fully synchronized: the sensors that become active do so all at the same time and each operation of the life cycle is performed by all robots simultaneously [1,6,11,13,19,20,21,29,41,52]. In the asynchronous model (Async), there is no global clock, and the robots do not have a common notion of time; furthermore, the duration of each activity (or inactivity) is finite but unpredictable [15,26,27,36,46].…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, three models are commonly used: Fsync, Ssync, and Async; the fully synchronous model Fsync is the strongest, the asynchronous model Async is the weakest, and the semisynchronous model Ssync lies in between. In the synchronous models (Fsync and Ssync), the cycles of all robots are fully synchronized: the sensors that become active do so all at the same time and each operation of the life cycle is performed by all robots simultaneously [1,6,11,13,19,20,21,29,41,52]. In the asynchronous model (Async), there is no global clock, and the robots do not have a common notion of time; furthermore, the duration of each activity (or inactivity) is finite but unpredictable [15,26,27,36,46].…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting fundamental research question is the definition of cost measures and their use in the analysis of the complexity of the solution protocols. A step in this direction has been taken recently, analyzing the number of rounds for the (simpler) Converge problem in the case of synchronous robots [19]. of l and l , respectively, at time t. Recall that, by Property 10, when executing movePairwiseCautiously(l , l , c) at time t, l (resp., l ) will perform a nonnull movement only if |N (t)| ≥ |N (t)| (resp., |N (t)| ≥ |N (t)|).…”
Section: Correctness Of Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different goal, but with a similar model for the robots and their environment, is pursued by Degener et al in [5]. Instead of forming a circle, the robots gather at a single point on the plane in O(n 2 ) rounds with n being the number of robots.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We study one of the most fundamental problems of self-organization of mobile entities, known in the literature as the gathering problem (see e.g., [8,10,14] and references therein). In particular, we consider oblivious robots initially located at different nodes of an anonymous ring that have to gather at a common node and remain in there.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of let meet mobile entities on graphs [2,11,20] or open spaces [5,10,22] has been extensively studied in the last decades. When only two robots are involved, the problem is referred to as the rendezvous problem [1,4,6,11,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%