2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Three-in-One Immunotherapy Nanoweapon via Cascade-Amplifying Cancer-Immunity Cycle against Tumor Metastasis, Relapse, and Postsurgical Regrowth

Abstract: The antitumor immune response involves a cascade of three phases, namely, antigen presentation (Phase I), lymphocyte activation and proliferation/differentiation (Phase II), and tumor elimination (Phase III). Therefore, an ideal immunotherapy nanoplatform is one that can simultaneously execute these three phases. However, it is of great challenge to develop a single immunotherapy nanoplatform which can deliver individual immunoagent to their ondemand target sites for simultaneously tailoring three phases becau… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the immune system remains inactive against malignant cells, allowing their uncontrolled growth and proliferation. The immune checkpoint inhibitors interfere with the action of these checkpoint proteins to prevent tumors from suppressing the T cells and restart the tumor immune cycle (Kieler et al, 2018;Li et al, 2019). Immune checkpoint inhibitors, in principle, should have a wide range of killing capabilities against cancer, but a large number of cases of non-response have been found in clinical applications (Ellmark et al, 2015; Coffelt and de Visser, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the immune system remains inactive against malignant cells, allowing their uncontrolled growth and proliferation. The immune checkpoint inhibitors interfere with the action of these checkpoint proteins to prevent tumors from suppressing the T cells and restart the tumor immune cycle (Kieler et al, 2018;Li et al, 2019). Immune checkpoint inhibitors, in principle, should have a wide range of killing capabilities against cancer, but a large number of cases of non-response have been found in clinical applications (Ellmark et al, 2015; Coffelt and de Visser, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al developed a three‐in‐one immunotherapy nanoplatform that can simultaneously promote TAA presentation, induce lymphocyte activation and proliferation, and inhibit tumor growth and metastasis ( Figure a). [ 69 ] This nanoplatform was synthesized by the self‐assembly of Ce6‐conjugated HC, 1MT‐conjugated polylysine (PM), and anti‐PD‐L1 monoclonal antibodies (aPD‐L1) (designated as aPD‐L1@HC/PM NPs). After accumulation at the tumor site, aPD‐L1@HC/PM NPs could effectively enter tumor cells and release aPD‐L1 to block the PD‐1/PD‐L1 signaling pathway via HAase‐activated charge reversal.…”
Section: Immunometabolic Therapy–based Multiple Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the most immune checkpoint inhibitors were administered intravenously at a later stage, which act on immune cells universally rather than specific tumor antigens with the risks of inducing side effects (Shao et al, 2020 ). Linking UCNPs with immune checkpoint inhibitors together in a nanoplatform to release immune checkpoint inhibitors to tumor site through the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect would be a promising strategy to improve the therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapy and reduce immune-related side effects (Li et al, 2019a ).…”
Section: Conclution and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%