2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1365-1609(01)00013-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A three-dimensional slope stability analysis method using the upper bound theorem Part II: numerical approaches, applications and extensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence it is not easy to obtain the lower bound solutions for a practical slope problem. In the upper bound approach, the kinematically admissible velocity fields are constructed by a rigid element which makes the limit analysis of slope stability suitable for complex conditions such as slopes with complex geometries, profiles, groundwater conditions and complicated loadings [8][9][10]. However, rigid finite elements, linear finite elements, non linear programming or special sequential quadratic programming algorithm has also been used to obtain the optimal upper bound solution for structures and geotechnical problems [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence it is not easy to obtain the lower bound solutions for a practical slope problem. In the upper bound approach, the kinematically admissible velocity fields are constructed by a rigid element which makes the limit analysis of slope stability suitable for complex conditions such as slopes with complex geometries, profiles, groundwater conditions and complicated loadings [8][9][10]. However, rigid finite elements, linear finite elements, non linear programming or special sequential quadratic programming algorithm has also been used to obtain the optimal upper bound solution for structures and geotechnical problems [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, the widespread utilization of infinite slope stability analysis limits a reliable application of these models to shallow landslides on open slopes, even if landslides frequently develop in convergent topographies where a contribution of lateral strength can be relevant (Hungr, 1987;Lam and Fredlund, 1993;Stark and Eid, 1998;Chen et al, 2001;Ohlmacher, 2007). Today, only a few attempts have been done for the application of 3D stability analysis at large-scales, allowing to model deeper rotational landslides (Xie et al, 2003).…”
Section: Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.5D and 3D slip surface models have been applied either for model testing (e.g . Hovland 1979;Hungr 1988;Lam and Fredlund 1993;Xie et al 2003;Mergili et al 2014a) or for particular case studies (Seed et al 1990;Chen et al 2001;Chen et al 2003;Jia et al 2012;Mergili et al 2014b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%