2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10175-0_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Theoretical Study of Kolmogorov-Smirnov Distinguishers

Abstract: In this paper, we carry out a detailed mathematical study of two theoretical distinguishers based on the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) distance. This includes a proof of soundness and the derivation of closedform expressions, which can be split into two factors: one depending only on the noise and the other on the confusion coefficient of Fei, Luo and Ding. This allows one to have a deeper understanding of the relative influences of the signal-to-noise ratio and the confusion coefficient on the distinguisher's perfo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The inverse relation between high nonlinear distributions of S-boxes (low differentially uniform permutations) and the variance of the confusion coefficient vector are explained by Heuser et al [28]. They ensure that high nonlinear elements have low variance in the confusion coefficient, therefore they are weak against DPA attacks according to [13].…”
Section: B Our Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inverse relation between high nonlinear distributions of S-boxes (low differentially uniform permutations) and the variance of the confusion coefficient vector are explained by Heuser et al [28]. They ensure that high nonlinear elements have low variance in the confusion coefficient, therefore they are weak against DPA attacks according to [13].…”
Section: B Our Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We expect that arbitrary keys, different from a real key, will look the same for the DPA attack at a higher value of variance. It increases the DPA resistance of the S-box [22,23]. Next, we recall the Stirling formula for factorial calculation.…”
Section: Basic Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El instrumento pasó por la validez de contenido (Ding y Hershberger, 2002), teniendo como resultado válido. Para la evaluación de la confiabilidad se realizó una prueba piloto, que permitió la validación del constructo (Lawshe, 1975) y la confiabilidad se analizó con el análisis estadístico del alfa de Cronbach (Cronbach, 1951) cuyo resultado fue 0.817, con lo que se concluye que el instrumento presenta alta confiabilidad y coherencia interna y en el análisis de resultados de la investigación se utilizó un estadígrafo no paramétrico denominado regresión logística (Maurandi-López, Del Río, González-Vidal, Ferre y Hernández, 2019), debido a los resultados no normales arrojados por la prueba de Kolmogorov -Smirnov (Heuser, Rioul y Guilley, 2014), considerando el tamaño de la muestra de 111 encuestas como grande (Burdenski, 2000).…”
Section: Desarrollounclassified