1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0004-3702(96)00027-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A theoretical evaluation of selected backtracking algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
69
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Completeness follows from this fact in analogy to the completeness proof for centralized backtracking in [7]. By Lemma 3, it is enough to prove completeness for the case where there are no Not_OK messages.…”
Section: Lemma 3 Consistent C Pas That Are Not Sent Forward For Extenmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Completeness follows from this fact in analogy to the completeness proof for centralized backtracking in [7]. By Lemma 3, it is enough to prove completeness for the case where there are no Not_OK messages.…”
Section: Lemma 3 Consistent C Pas That Are Not Sent Forward For Extenmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Several researchers have tried to combine lookahead strategies with some learning techniques. While CBJ [9] brings some improvements to FC, it seems to alter MAC [2]. The explanation can be that CBJ brings pruning at an average cost superior to the average efficiency of MAC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Typical intelligent backtrackers are the Constraint-Based Back-jumping (CBJ), the BackMarking [9], the Dynamic Backtracking [6] and the Partial Order Dynamic Backtracking [3]. The most popular lookahead strategies are Forward Checking (FC) and Maintaining Arc-Consistency (MAC) [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The joint optimization of scheduling and register allocation is addressed by [19] and [20]. General backtracking algorithms for constraint satisfaction problems have been evaluated [21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%