2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A test of the symbol interdependency hypothesis with both concrete and abstract stimuli

Abstract: In Experiment 1, the symbol interdependency hypothesis was tested with both concrete and abstract stimuli. Symbolic (i.e., semantic neighbourhood distance) and embodied (i.e., iconicity) factors were manipulated in two tasks—one that tapped symbolic relations (i.e., semantic relatedness judgment) and another that tapped embodied relations (i.e., iconicity judgment). Results supported the symbol interdependency hypothesis in that the symbolic factor was recruited for the semantic relatedness task and the embodi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
(110 reference statements)
4
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relatively later N700 modulations by the imageability of novel words in our study might be due to their novelty, which could have led to a delayed processing in comparison to familiar concrete and abstract words. Previous findings concerning the temporal dynamics of the N700 for familiar words, however, are inconsistent, with findings of early onsets around 500 ms (compare e.g., [ 35 , 51 ]) as well as relatively late onsets only after 700 ms (compare e.g., [ 36 ]). Thus, exploring the functional role of different stages of the N700 might be a promising approach for further research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The relatively later N700 modulations by the imageability of novel words in our study might be due to their novelty, which could have led to a delayed processing in comparison to familiar concrete and abstract words. Previous findings concerning the temporal dynamics of the N700 for familiar words, however, are inconsistent, with findings of early onsets around 500 ms (compare e.g., [ 35 , 51 ]) as well as relatively late onsets only after 700 ms (compare e.g., [ 36 ]). Thus, exploring the functional role of different stages of the N700 might be a promising approach for further research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The N700 result for the real words employed in the present study appears to indicate that the chosen task was appropriate for eliciting imagery processes. Concerning the lateralization of the N700 CE, previous studies yielded inconsistent findings, with more pronounced CEs either over the left [ 35 ] or right hemisphere ([ 34 ], but at occipital electrode sites), or no laterality difference at all [ 36 , 51 , 52 ]. However, in our study, the lateralization is in line with the stronger right hemispheric late N700 CE found for real abstract and concrete words.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a replication of one of the studies that motivated the development of the CAM 6 , context availability canceled out the CE only if subjective familiarity was not controlled 7 . Furthermore, studies controlling for imageability, context availability and/or familiarity reported an inverse CE, with faster and/or more accurate responses to abstract than concrete words 8 10 , which neither of the two theoretical approaches can explain. Instead, this processing facilitation for abstract words has been ascribed to a higher number of lexical associations 9 and enriching emotional content (measured in terms of higher valence and arousal) for abstract than concrete words 8 , 11 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Spatial iconicity (hereafter referred to as iconicity) refers to a correspondence between the spatial position of a word and its referent (e.g., airplane on top and car on the bottom). Again, consistent with a flexible approach, researchers have noted that an activation of spatial features is not automatic but rather dependent on whether a task makes the features salient (Lebois et al, 2015; Malhi & Buchanan, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%