2003
DOI: 10.1554/0014-3820(2003)057[0630:atotea]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Test of the Endogenous and Exogenous Selection Hypotheses for the Maintenance of a Narrow Avian Hybrid Zone

Abstract: •The contributions of genetic and environmental factors to differential reproductive success across hybrid zones have rarely been tested. Here, we report a manipulative experiment that simultaneously tested endogenous (genetic-based) and exogenous (environmental-based) selection within a hybrid zone. We transplanted mated pairs of two chickadee species {Poecile atricapilla and P. carolinensis) and their hybrids into isolated woodlots within their hybrid zone and monitored their reproductive success. Although c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
49
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
49
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Male sparrows responded more strongly to homotypic than heterotypic song, as measured by proximity to the playback unit and agonistic behaviors (Fig. Response was higher in allopatry than at the edge of the hybrid zone, suggesting that males of either subspecies defend territories against any song sparrow, an important point given that competition between males affects hybridization rates (Bronson et al 2003). This result is consistent with those from numerous other studies of passerines, including the song sparrow (e.g., Searcy et al 1997Searcy et al , 2003.…”
Section: Mate Choice and Agonistic Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Male sparrows responded more strongly to homotypic than heterotypic song, as measured by proximity to the playback unit and agonistic behaviors (Fig. Response was higher in allopatry than at the edge of the hybrid zone, suggesting that males of either subspecies defend territories against any song sparrow, an important point given that competition between males affects hybridization rates (Bronson et al 2003). This result is consistent with those from numerous other studies of passerines, including the song sparrow (e.g., Searcy et al 1997Searcy et al , 2003.…”
Section: Mate Choice and Agonistic Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Nonetheless, historical isolation and divergent selection in distinctive, rangewide associations of climate and vegetation likely restricts further expansion and overlap of the two species. Although additional work is needed to test the relative importance of endogenous (geneticbased) and exogenous (environmental-based) selection on B. inornatus and B. ridgwayi in this region (Bronson et al 2003), findings from this study provide important insight into the complex interplay of history, adaptation, and gene flow in influencing distributions and local sympatry of close relatives in recent secondary contact.…”
Section: Secondary Contact Asymmetry Of Gene Flow and Local Adaptatmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A survey of the recent animal literature on linkage disequilibrium suggests that, on average, four polymorphic loci (range 2-9 loci) genotyped for ;50 animals per location have been used to detect an LD of ;0.16 (range of significant results 0.02-0.35: see Szymura and Barton 1986, Mallet et al 1990, Bert and Arnold 1995, Duggins et al 1995, Hare and Avise 1996, Planes and Doherty 1997, Lenormand et al 1998, Rawson et al 1999, Bierne et al 2002, 2003, Dasmahapatra et al 2002, Bronson et al 2003, Morgan-Richards and Wallis 2003, Nielsen et al 2003, Rawson et al 2003, Vines et al 2003. A survey of the recent animal literature on linkage disequilibrium suggests that, on average, four polymorphic loci (range 2-9 loci) genotyped for ;50 animals per location have been used to detect an LD of ;0.16 (range of significant results 0.02-0.35: see Szymura and Barton 1986, Mallet et al 1990, Bert and Arnold 1995, Duggins et al 1995, Hare and Avise 1996, Planes and Doherty 1997, Lenormand et al 1998, Rawson et al 1999, Bierne et al 2002, 2003, Dasmahapatra et al 2002, Bronson et al 2003, Morgan-Richards and Wallis 2003, Nielsen et al 2003, Rawson et al 2003, Vines et al 2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%