2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-007-9334-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Test of Motivational Plus Nicotine Replacement Interventions for HIV Positive Smokers

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to test two combination motivational plus pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation among HIV positive smokers. Participants were 40 adults receiving HIV care who smoked daily reporting interest in smoking reduction. Measures were administered at baseline, 1-month, and 3-month follow-ups. Participants were randomly assigned to self-guided reading plus nicotine patch (n = 18) or motivational interviewing plus nicotine patch (n = 22). Groups did not differ at 3 months on b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
75
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another trial comparing self-guided reading of smoking cessation materials (plus NRT) to motivational interviewing (single session plus NRT) revealed no significant group differences at 3-month follow-up. 36 One pilot study randomized PLWHA to either a combined 8-week NRT and SBIRT (Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral for Treatment) counseling or a usual care condition which involved standard HIV medical care and no smoking cessation treatment (although participants in standard care did participate in smoking assessments on the same schedule as the SBIRT group). 37 SBIRT resulted in fewer self-reported cigarettes smoked per day, lower physical nicotine dependence, lower smoking urge, and lower nicotine withdrawal symptoms than participants in an assessment-only condition.…”
Section: Behavioral Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another trial comparing self-guided reading of smoking cessation materials (plus NRT) to motivational interviewing (single session plus NRT) revealed no significant group differences at 3-month follow-up. 36 One pilot study randomized PLWHA to either a combined 8-week NRT and SBIRT (Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral for Treatment) counseling or a usual care condition which involved standard HIV medical care and no smoking cessation treatment (although participants in standard care did participate in smoking assessments on the same schedule as the SBIRT group). 37 SBIRT resulted in fewer self-reported cigarettes smoked per day, lower physical nicotine dependence, lower smoking urge, and lower nicotine withdrawal symptoms than participants in an assessment-only condition.…”
Section: Behavioral Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, a few smaller, uncontrolled, and open-label trials have shown smoking reduction among PLWHA using NRT and behavioral interventions. 11,36,40 Compliance with NRT tends to be poor across studies. 36,42 Further, it appears that psychological variables, including self-efficacy and motivation (decisional balance) around quitting, may mediate the relationship between NRT use and smoking abstinence.…”
Section: Medication Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We excluded 13 additional studies for the following reasons: the outcome was not abstinence (4 studies), no control group (4 studies), follow-up less than four weeks (1 study), quasi-experimental study (1 study), face-to-face or mHealth interventions were not specified (1 study), zero smoking abstinence rate in both intervention and control groups, yields a computational error (1 study), and participants in the intervention arm received either mHealth or face-to-face interventions but not both (1 study). Hence, 10 RCTs met the inclusion criteria and included in the analysis [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] .…”
Section: Study Selection and Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Average age of the study population was 45 years (range: 42 to 50) and women comprised about 37% (range: 8% to 100%). Smoking cessation strategies were administered face-to-face in seven studies, [14][15][16][17][18]20,21 and sustained smoking abstinence estimates were reported in four studies. 14,[21][22][23] The intensity and maximum follow-up period ranged from 4 weeks to as much 52 weeks.…”
Section: Study Selection and Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%