2016
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-3961-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth gravity model

Abstract: We present a test of general relativity, the measurement of the Earth’s dragging of inertial frames. Our result is obtained using about 3.5 years of laser-ranged observations of the LARES, LAGEOS, and LAGEOS 2 laser-ranged satellites together with the Earth gravity field model GGM05S produced by the space geodesy mission GRACE. We measure , where is the Earth’s dragging of inertial frames normalized to its general relativity value, 0.002 is the 1-sigma formal error and 0.05 is our preliminary estimate of syst… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
87
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…GP-B experiment has also verified the weak equivalence principle for macroscopic rotating bodies to ultraprecision [149]. Recently, Ciufolini et al [150] have used about 3.5 years of laser-range observations of the LARES, LAGEOS, and LAGEOS2 satellites together with the Earth gravity field model GGM05S produced by the space geodesy mission GRACE to measure the Earth's dragging of inertial frames to be 0.994 ± 0.002 ± 0.05 of the general relativity value with 0.002 the 1- formal error and 0.05 their preliminary estimate of systematic error. …”
Section: Lunar Laser Ranging (Llr) Tests Of Relativistic Gravitymentioning
confidence: 79%
“…GP-B experiment has also verified the weak equivalence principle for macroscopic rotating bodies to ultraprecision [149]. Recently, Ciufolini et al [150] have used about 3.5 years of laser-range observations of the LARES, LAGEOS, and LAGEOS2 satellites together with the Earth gravity field model GGM05S produced by the space geodesy mission GRACE to measure the Earth's dragging of inertial frames to be 0.994 ± 0.002 ± 0.05 of the general relativity value with 0.002 the 1- formal error and 0.05 their preliminary estimate of systematic error. …”
Section: Lunar Laser Ranging (Llr) Tests Of Relativistic Gravitymentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Between 2004 and 2016, frame-dragging was tested in a series of papers with an accuracy between about 10% and 5% using the two LAGEOS satellites [21,22,23,25,24] and the LARES and LAGEOS satellites [26,9]. In 2011, frame-dragging was tested using the Gravity Probe B experiment with an accuracy of about 20% [27].…”
Section: General Relativity Dragging Of Inertial Frames and The Objementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the largest uncertainties in modelling the nodal shift of an Earth satellite are those due to the Earth quadrupole moment, J 2 , and to the next higher degree even zonal harmonic, J 4 . Indeed, thanks to the GRACE determinations of the Earth gravity field and of its variations, the error in modeling the even zonal harmonics of degree strictly higher than four is at the level of a few percent only (see section 3) [25,9,22,34,26].…”
Section: The Lares Lageos Lageos and Grace Satellites And The Methomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another satellite experiment, Gravity Probe B (GPB), was put into orbit in 2004 and verified frame dragging (via a related gyroscope precession effect) with approximately 20% accuracy [12]. Very recently, preliminary analysis of the LARES laser ranged satellite along with the two LAGEOS satellites and latest GRACE results, produced a frame dragging consistent with that predicted by GR, with estimated 5% errors [13]. We summarize the results of that analysis below and then go on to model thermally induced forces on LARES.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…tides, non-gravitational perturbations and other unidentified effects, amount to about 0.03. The combination of all those errors, using the total Root Sum Squared (RSS), provides a value of 5% 1 Note that the analysis described above and reported in [13] solves for thermally generated forces from the data, rather than predicting them from a model. The rest of this paper describes a model for those forces [28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%