2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A test of cross section dependence for a linear dynamic panel model with regressors

Abstract: Please cite this article as: Sarafidis, V., Yamagata, T., Robertson, D., A test of cross section dependence for a linear dynamic panel model with regressors. Journal of Econometrics (2008Econometrics ( ), doi:10.1016Econometrics ( /j.jeconom.2008 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
116
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
116
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Cross-sectional dependence among errors can be eliminated by including time dummies or by cross-sectionally demeaning the data. We created year-dummy control variables to prevent cross-individual correlation [84,85], thereby improving the robustness of our results [86]. It calls for a first-order dynamic panel-data approach to exploring the relationships between the variable in question.…”
Section: Panel Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-sectional dependence among errors can be eliminated by including time dummies or by cross-sectionally demeaning the data. We created year-dummy control variables to prevent cross-individual correlation [84,85], thereby improving the robustness of our results [86]. It calls for a first-order dynamic panel-data approach to exploring the relationships between the variable in question.…”
Section: Panel Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another concern related to the specification of panel data models has been raised by Sarafidis et al (2009), who claim that panel data are likely to suffer from crosssectional dependence, which may arise due to spatial dependence, economic distance and common shocks. In order to tackle this problem, we have followed the conventional method of including year dummies in the model.…”
Section: Model and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to tackle this problem, we have followed the conventional method of including year dummies in the model. However, Sarafidis et al (2009) claim that the inclusion of time dummies may not be sufficient to tackle the problem of cross-sectional dependence. These authors suggest that the above tests of instrument validity may be indicative for the presence of a cross-sectional dependence problem.…”
Section: Model and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, where a multifactor error structure is employed for the purpose of dimension reduction, or simply when explanatory variables may not be observable. In such cases, it could be relevant to know whether there is indeed a factor structure in (1), or whether common effects can be adequately represented by more parsimonious models such as a model with cross-sectional or time dummies, as also studied by Sarafidis, Yamagata andRobertson (2009), and in the context of model (1) with homogeneous slopes. In this case, the asymptotics of the estimated common factors and loadings is obviously a first, fundamental step in order to construct tests for the presence of a multifactor error structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…γ i = γ), equation (1) is tantamount to a panel regression with a time effect -therefore there is no real common factor structure. This fact is used by Sarafidis, Yamagata and Robertson (2009) to test for cross dependence in a dynamic panel context. Similarly, in the case of homogeneous factors (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%