2019
DOI: 10.23972/det2019iss19pp18-28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Técnica Delphi e Análise de Conteúdo como Estratégias de Obtenção do Consenso em dinâmicas de design participativo

Abstract: Em 2012, a tese de doutorado denominada ‘<omitido para revisão cega>' (2011) foi referenciada por Santa Rosa no livro 'Design Participativo' para apresentar brevemente a técnica Delphi como uma possível ferramenta para engajar os participantes. O objetivo da tese foi estabelecer fundamentos educacionais e ergonômicos para a aprendizagem assíncrona, no entanto, em virtude da identificação da lacuna de conhecimento sobre temas como Delphi técnica, análise de conteúdo e ferramentas gráficas serão abordadas … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is important to seek the participation of a number of evaluators that make analysis of the material according to the proposed methodology feasible 16 . Heterogeneity in the group fo experts is also advised to ensure validity of results, given that multidisciplinarity allows to obtain more valid predictive consensuses 20 .…”
Section: /17mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is important to seek the participation of a number of evaluators that make analysis of the material according to the proposed methodology feasible 16 . Heterogeneity in the group fo experts is also advised to ensure validity of results, given that multidisciplinarity allows to obtain more valid predictive consensuses 20 .…”
Section: /17mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, it is necessary to keep in mind that information extracted from evaluations has to be considered a tool of negotiation between multiple interests rather than the truth. In other words, researchers must consider mostly referees' concurring evaluations and opinions, whereas individual opinions can be questioned and complied with (or not) depending on the objectives and methods of the main researcher 16,[20][21] .…”
Section: /17mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was decided to send the invitation to all these professionals Acosta AS, Barbosa SFF, Sasso GTMD. priorities aimed at the patients, their family, and the professional needs, content analysis was adopted (8) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%