A techno-economic evaluation of the use of hydrogen in a steel production process, utilizing nuclear process heat

Germeshuizen, L.M.; Blom, Peder

doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.06.076

Cited by 45 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The relative comparison of results between the different production routes though, is very relevant for the technology evaluation. Comparable to (Germeshuizen and Blom, 2013) also the current results cannot be generalized since the model represents a hypothetical plant.…”

Section: Model Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 73%

Techno-economic evaluation of innovative steel production technologies

Fischedick

Marzinkowski

Winzer

et al. 2014

Journal of Cleaner Production

226

143

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Model Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 73%

Techno-economic evaluation of innovative steel production technologies

Fischedick

Marzinkowski

Winzer

et al. 2014

Journal of Cleaner Production

226

143

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…transport, chemical. Phasing-out nuclear capacity in some countries shall also be analysed in terms of being replaced by RES-based energy especially in the light of options of use of hydrogen in steel production utilizing nuclear process heat [ 171 ]. State ownership of the I&S industry and/or power enterprises poses an interesting challenge of large scale private-public partnership.…”

Section: Identification Of Barriers and Inducements Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Technology innovation system analysis of decarbonisation options in the EU steel industry

Skoczkowski

Verdolini

Bielecki

et al. 2020

Energy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Decarbonisation of the iron and steel (I&S) industry is crucial in the efforts to meet the EU GHG emission reduction objectives in 2030 … 2050. Promoting decarbonisation in this sector will necessarily require the identification, development, and diffusion of breakthrough technologies for I&S production. This paper uses an approach inspired by the Technology Innovation System (TIS) to analyse the development of technology in the EU I&S industry and identify potential avenues of its decarbonisation. We have described key elements of the TIS, analyse the functioning of these elements and their interactions in a more general context of innovation dynamics and policy design; The focus has been put on the role of actors and the identification of the main specific blocking and inducement mechanism in the TIS to better explain its functioning. Risks and uncertainties have also been discussed. We argue that deep decarbonisation in the I&S industry is feasible but its TIS requires firm support, mostly political, to finance intensive R&D and reduce the business risk. To this end, all actors shall support more effectively the invention and implementation of new radical production technologies. The recommendations are mostly addressed to politicians although stressing the importance of collaboration of all actors.

show abstract

“…Some previous studies, for instant, using hydrogen [16,37,38] and biomass such as wood charcoal or syngas [39][40][41] as alternative energy sources for iron and steel production have been done. But lots of critical factors that limit the role of using biomass and hydrogen in CO 2 abatement from iron and steel making processes.…”

Section: Co 2 Emission From Iron and Steel Productionmentioning

confidence: 99%