1976
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1976.tb03669.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Technique for Improving the Accuracy of Finite Element Solutions for Magnetotelluric Data

Abstract: This paper develops a finite element method which gives accurate numerical approximations to magnetotelluric data over two-dimensional conductivity structures. The method employs a simple finite element technique to find the field component parallel to the strike of the structure and a new numerical differentiation scheme to find the field component perpendicular to strike. Examples show that the new numerical differentiation scheme is a significant improvement over the standard finite element procedure when m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
91
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(8 reference statements)
1
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Gauss-Newton method, a locally linear misfit functional is assumed (Kormendi & Dietrich, 1991;Menke, 1989;Aster et al, 2005), which allows the second order term of the Hessian to be dropped (Virieux & Operto, 2009). We obtain explicitly the sensitivity matrix J by perturbing each model parameter at each layer depth; the resulting partial derivative wavefield is propagated from the secondary virtual sources to the receivers' position (Rodi, 1976;Sheen et al, 2006;Operto et al, 2013). The effectiveness of this approach in scaling and weighting the gradient is higher than the steepest-descent and quasi-Newton methods, because the approximate Hessian J T J is computed rather than statistically estimated.…”
Section: Gauss-newton Seismic Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Gauss-Newton method, a locally linear misfit functional is assumed (Kormendi & Dietrich, 1991;Menke, 1989;Aster et al, 2005), which allows the second order term of the Hessian to be dropped (Virieux & Operto, 2009). We obtain explicitly the sensitivity matrix J by perturbing each model parameter at each layer depth; the resulting partial derivative wavefield is propagated from the secondary virtual sources to the receivers' position (Rodi, 1976;Sheen et al, 2006;Operto et al, 2013). The effectiveness of this approach in scaling and weighting the gradient is higher than the steepest-descent and quasi-Newton methods, because the approximate Hessian J T J is computed rather than statistically estimated.…”
Section: Gauss-newton Seismic Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forward modeling is based on the same numerical implementation of the finite difference method as of Zhdanov et al [1982] and de Lugao et al [1997]. We use the reciprocity principle [Madden, 1972;Rodi, 1976;McGillivray and Oldenburg, 1990;de Lugao and Wannamaker, 1996;de Lugao et al, 1997] for Frechet derivative calculations. Note that according to the construction the minimum support functional generates a stable solution that tends to produce the smallest possible anomalous domain.…”
Section: Regularized Solution Of a Discrete Mt Inverse Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where F ik are the elements of the Frechet derivative matrix computed, for example, using the reciprocity principle [Madden, 1972;Rodi, 1976;McGillvray and Oldenburg, 1990;McGillvary et al, 1994;de Lugao and Wannamaker, 1996;de Lugao et al, 1997]. Following Mehanee et al…”
Section: Formulation Of the Weighted Inverse Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computer code is based on that of OGAWA (1988) which follows the finite element method described in RODI (1976). The weighted inversion and the ABIC-minimization schemes are added.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%