2009 International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience 2009
DOI: 10.1109/qomex.2009.5246986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A taxonomy of quality of service and Quality of Experience of multimodal human-machine interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
66
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Quality can also be understood as characterizing the extent of the compromise between the expectations that the user has of the designed user interface and its characteristics as perceived during its usage. In a general description of quality in the context of multimodal human-machine interaction, Möller et al [8] consider QoE to incorporate all the aspects influencing user perception and satisfaction when using the system, which result in the acceptability of a service. According to Hassenzahl et al [6], this is determined by both ergonomic quality factors, referring to traditional usability parameters as defined in the ISO 9241-11 standard [7] and hedonic quality factors, comprising dimensions with no obvious relation to the task, such as originality, design etc.…”
Section: Quality Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality can also be understood as characterizing the extent of the compromise between the expectations that the user has of the designed user interface and its characteristics as perceived during its usage. In a general description of quality in the context of multimodal human-machine interaction, Möller et al [8] consider QoE to incorporate all the aspects influencing user perception and satisfaction when using the system, which result in the acceptability of a service. According to Hassenzahl et al [6], this is determined by both ergonomic quality factors, referring to traditional usability parameters as defined in the ISO 9241-11 standard [7] and hedonic quality factors, comprising dimensions with no obvious relation to the task, such as originality, design etc.…”
Section: Quality Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A taxonomy of QoS and QoE aspects in multimodal human computer interaction have been proposed by Moller et al (2009). It consists of three layers: 1) QoS influencing factors, which include the characteristics of user, system and context of use, exerting a impact on perceived quality, 2) QoS interaction performance aspects, describing the user and system performance and behavior, and 3) QoE aspects, relating to users' quality perception and judgment.…”
Section: Qoe Framework In Mobile Multimediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we focus on QoE related to multimedia applications such as voice over IP (VoIP). We note that the current state-of-the-art (see, [14,24,21,15,3,2,5,23,9,11,4,17,19,22,12,13]) does not address the problem of QoE measurement of multimedia applications over time. Mostly experiments are conducted in the lab settings or living lab settings [4] and then conclusions regarding QoE are drawn.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be attributed to the fact that QoE not only depends on network parameters, but also on user's, device and the environmental context parameters [24,13,3,15]. These parameters together, affect users' expectations and their cognitive, behavioral and psychological states [24,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation