Companion Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Modularity 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2892664.2892684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A taxonomy of context-aware software variability approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a future work, we will explore how to enrich our taxonomy with others related existing works that explore complementary aspects to context-aware mobile applications. As for example, in [16] the authors present a taxonomy related to context-aware computing and dynamic software variability management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a future work, we will explore how to enrich our taxonomy with others related existing works that explore complementary aspects to context-aware mobile applications. As for example, in [16] the authors present a taxonomy related to context-aware computing and dynamic software variability management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the mission abortion feature should be included when Tiriba UAV is flying in a controlled/segregated airspace . Relationships between system and usage context features can also be specified in separated feature models . This paper focuses on the analysis of dependability properties, in terms of safety and reliability , of the Tiriba Flight Control System SPL (ie, the control unit shown in Figure [right]), detailed in Section .…”
Section: Background and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The context model comprises features describing variation on the SPL environment , ie, where and how system features are intended to be used. The strategy of separating SPL domain modeling into two interconnected feature models is based on the Hartman and Trew feature modeling approach and its refinements . Such approaches allow a clear specification of interactions, eg, requires and excludes , among system and usage context features that may impact on both design and dependability assets.…”
Section: Dependable‐sple Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some approaches, the variability model is augmented with context features [14], [15], [16], [10] or binding time [11], [13] information. Still, verification is restricted to monitoring context changes, checking what features need to be (de)selected and verifying if these features can be rebound at runtime.…”
Section: B Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%