“…These models claim that, in contrast to traditional cognitive-developmental models in the tradition of Jean Piaget (see, e.g., Baird & Fugelsang, 2004), increased risk taking is not caused by characteristics of adolescent cognitive processes alone but that affective processes-particularly the balance between affective and deliberative processes-are crucial in adolescent risk taking. Consistent with these dual-system models and based on behavioral and developmental neuroscience research findings, our hypothesis is that increased adolescent risk taking is more likely to occur when affective and motivational processes are involved (e.g., Bischof, 1975Bischof, , 1985Byrnes et al, 1999;Casey et al, 2008;Galvan, Hare, Voss, Glover, & Casey, 2007;Loewenstein, Weber, Hsee, & Welch, 2001;Steinberg, 2008;Weber, Shafir, & Blais, 2004;Wilson & Daly, 1985). Because hypothetical risky choice scenarios, such as choices between monetary lotteries without outcome feedback, typically trigger only minor affective processes, our hypothesis predicts that increased adolescent risk taking would not usually be found with such measures.…”