2013
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systems Approach to Sustainable Technical Product Design

Abstract: Summary Many existing methods for sustainable technical product design focus on environmental efficiency while lacking a framework for a holistic, sustainable design approach that includes combined social, technical, economic, and environmental aspects in the whole product life cycle, and that provides guidance on a technical product development level. This research proposes a framework for sustainable technical product design in the case of skis. We developed a ski under the Grown brand, benchmarked according… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors took LCSA elements and either developed a simplified tool that allows quick assessment of wastewater treatment options based on LCA and LCC [60] or combined LCA and economic indicators to assess biogas production options in Kenya [61]. Other partial integration was done by Luthe et al [62] who developed a tool that integrates LCA, S-LCA, and economical aspects into product design, while Mjörnell et al [63] claimed to integrate all three LCSA components into their sustainability assessment, even though they chose indicators from the S2020 Knowledge Matrix instead of established S-LCA sources.…”
Section: Alternative Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors took LCSA elements and either developed a simplified tool that allows quick assessment of wastewater treatment options based on LCA and LCC [60] or combined LCA and economic indicators to assess biogas production options in Kenya [61]. Other partial integration was done by Luthe et al [62] who developed a tool that integrates LCA, S-LCA, and economical aspects into product design, while Mjörnell et al [63] claimed to integrate all three LCSA components into their sustainability assessment, even though they chose indicators from the S2020 Knowledge Matrix instead of established S-LCA sources.…”
Section: Alternative Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It quantifies the relevant emissions, consumption of resources and energy, and environmental impacts associated with the product, process, or system. The LCA is, therefore, a vital and robust decision support tool, complementing other methods which are equally necessary to help effectively and efficiently make consumption and production more sustainable [24]. Moreover, LCA brings a holistic perspective to decisionmaking and has gained acceptance as a decision-making tool in industry, procurement and policymaking.…”
Section: Lca Methodology-iso 14040/14044mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decisions on which directions and what methods will be developed by the resorts, which are taken at the level of the management boards of individual resorts, were often criticized for disregarding the principles of nature protection, including fundamental ones like the protection of plant and animal species under legal species protection [63,70]. According to Luthe et al [91] it is necessary to take a comprehensive view of how the tools and activities are designed in winter sports resorts to assess their impact on nature and make it as little as possible. On the other hand, Krtička et al [53] called for allocating the profits from the operation of individual resorts to nature protection instead of further development of infrastructure.…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%