2015
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review on tobacco use among civilian populations affected by armed conflict

Abstract: Some evidence indicates links between conflict and tobacco use but substantially more research is required.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and smoking and second-hand smoking is common in public places. Additionally, evidence suggests that people who live in regions affected by the armed conflict smoke more compared to those who live in non-conflict areas [22]. Therefore, a discrepancy in the prevalence of smoking between Belgrade University and Kosovska Mitrovica University could be expected.…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and smoking and second-hand smoking is common in public places. Additionally, evidence suggests that people who live in regions affected by the armed conflict smoke more compared to those who live in non-conflict areas [22]. Therefore, a discrepancy in the prevalence of smoking between Belgrade University and Kosovska Mitrovica University could be expected.…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With 26 countries now considered to be in active conflict or in the post-conflict setting [1], some 1.5 billion people are living in high exposure risk settings worldwide [2]. Evidence points towards links between conflict [3, 4, 5] and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) [6, 7] to tobacco use; as a result, these populations are much more likely to use, and/or be exposed to, tobacco. This can be attributed in part to the perceived stress relief of tobacco [3], and also to international tobacco companies using the weakened political situation in conflict zones to their advantage, by smuggling cigarettes [8] and shaping tobacco policy [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence points towards links between conflict [3, 4, 5] and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) [6, 7] to tobacco use; as a result, these populations are much more likely to use, and/or be exposed to, tobacco. This can be attributed in part to the perceived stress relief of tobacco [3], and also to international tobacco companies using the weakened political situation in conflict zones to their advantage, by smuggling cigarettes [8] and shaping tobacco policy [9]. Increases in smoking prevalence are not limited to the civilian population; there is a greater than average prevalence of smoking in army recruits [10], which increases further in those who are deployed, and especially those with combat exposure [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Jones & Fear, 2011;Kehle, Ferrier-Auerbach, Meis, Arbisi, Erbes, & Polusny, 2012;Kline, Weiner, Ciccone, Interian, St Hill, & Losonczy, 2014) In addition, the hardships experienced in conflict and post-conflict settings including limited access to health care, poor living conditions, loss of family and friends, and fragmented social support, may contribute to harmful alcohol use. (Ezard, 2012;Lo, Patel, & Roberts, 2015) Evidence from stable settings highlights the relationship between low social capital to individual high risk alcohol use, (Weitzman & Chen, 2005) and the greater harm per unit alcohol consumed in poor populations than rich ones. (Rehm, Mathers, Popova, Thavorncharoensap, Teerawattananon, & Patra, 2009) Harmful alcohol use is also a known risk-factor for NCDs in stable settings (Boden & Fergusson, 2011;G.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%