2019
DOI: 10.1002/tsm2.121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review on self‐determination theory in physical education

Abstract: The present study focused on researches using both psychological and physiological measurements in the context of physical education with a self‐determination framework. A total of 28 studies were selected and analyzed using types of measurements and their relations. This literature review was conducted to (a) establish the state‐of–the‐art of existing research using both types of measurement in the field of physical education, (b) discuss the effectiveness of each parameter considered in the selected studies,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some limitations of this study must be addressed. First, in this study, MVPA was considered to be an indicator of PA engagement in PE, an approach that is in line with previous research (Fairclough and Stratton, 2005;Saugy et al, 2020). However, MVPA is related to other educational outcomes, such as motor learning and cognitive, affective, and social outcomes (Casey and Goodyear, 2015;Coe et al, 2006;Kirk, 2010), and these outcomes must be considered in future research.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Some limitations of this study must be addressed. First, in this study, MVPA was considered to be an indicator of PA engagement in PE, an approach that is in line with previous research (Fairclough and Stratton, 2005;Saugy et al, 2020). However, MVPA is related to other educational outcomes, such as motor learning and cognitive, affective, and social outcomes (Casey and Goodyear, 2015;Coe et al, 2006;Kirk, 2010), and these outcomes must be considered in future research.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Exercise has been a major focus of SDT‐based interventions. Saugy et al 28 reviewed research in physical education with a self‐determination framework, and Szabo and Juwono 29 reviewed the efficacy of SDT‐based interventions in increasing students' physical activity, and both reviews suggest that SDT‐based interventions have the potential to increase physical activity. A review of pre‐school self‐regulation interventions from an SDT perspective found that targeting competence and nurturing children's autonomy led to more effective interventions, whereas relatedness appeared to have less impact 30 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found 11 recent reviews of the use of SDT in health contexts, 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 which we summarize briefly below, starting with more general reviews of health behaviour change, and moving to reviews that have a more specific context, including those that have focused on particular medical conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-Determination Theory (33) and Achievement Goal Theory (34) are two prominent psychological theories of motivation that have been applied extensively to physical activity interventions in school (35) and organized sport contexts (36). The former posits that satisfying individuals' basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness will support autonomous motivation, behavioral engagement, and psychological well-being (37).…”
Section: Delivered In An Engaging Mannermentioning
confidence: 99%