A Systematic Review of Tobacco Industry Tactics in Southeast Asia: Lessons for Other Low- And MiddleIncome Regions

Abstract

<jats:p> <jats:bold>Background:</jats:bold> Transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) have a well-established presence in Southeast Asia and are now targeting other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), especially Africa. While the tobacco industry’s tactics in Southeast Asia are well documented, no study has systematically reviewed these tactics to inform tobacco control policies and movements in Africa, where the tobacco epidemic is spreading. <jats:bold>Methods:</jats:bold> We conducted a systematic literature review of articles that describe tobacco industry tactics in Southeast Asia, which includes Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Myanmar, East Timor, Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam, Laos, and Brunei. After screening 512 articles, we gathered and analysed data from 134 articles which met our final inclusion criteria. <jats:bold>Results:</jats:bold> Tobacco transnationals gained dominance in Southeast Asian markets by positioning themselves as good corporate citizens with corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives, promoting the industry as a pillar of, and partner for, economic growth. Tobacco transnationals also formed strategic sectoral alliances and reinforced their political ties to delay the implementation of regulations and lobby for weaker tobacco control. Where governments resisted the transnationals’ attempts to enter a market, they used litigation and deceptive tactics including smuggling to pressure governments to open markets, and tarnished the reputation of public health organizations. The tobacco industry undermined tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship (TAPS) regulations through a broad range of direct and indirect marketing tactics. <jats:bold>Conclusion:</jats:bold> The experience of Southeast Asia with tobacco transnationals show that, beyond highlighting the public health benefits, underscoring the economic benefits of tobacco control might be a more compelling argument for governments in LMICs to prioritise tobacco control. Given the tobacco industry’s widespread use of litigation, LMICs need more legal support and resources to counter industry litigations. LMICs should also prioritize measures to protect health policy from the vested interests of the tobacco industry, and to close regulatory loopholes in tobacco marketing restrictions.</jats:p>

Tobacco control in Asia-Pacific: wins, challenges and targets

“…35 36 They even secretly employed scientists in the infamous 'Asian Whitecoat Project' to work undercover and slant the scientific data on secondhand smoke. [37][38][39][40] In some Asian countries, tobacco companies promote a 'revolving door' culture by recruiting former senior government finance and trade officials. 41 Over the last 30 years, many state tobacco monopolies in Asia have morphed into behaviour previously exhibited only by private transnational companies.…”

Uncovering the advertising and promotional strategies of tobacco companies in Cambodia: recall of below-the-line marketing among young male smokers

“…Tobacco companies have also used below-the-line marketing to target young people in low/middle-income countries (LMICs) in Southeast Asia 22. Previously documented strategies include advertising on social media platforms,23 tobacco retailer programmes to optimise POS promotions,24 individual sales promotions25 and trademark diversification 26.…”

Evidence on article 5.3 of FCTC (tobacco industry interference in tobacco control activities) in India- a qualitative scoping study

“…Governments in various countries have been sued by the TI to check the laws thoroughly or hamper their implementation [ 51 – 54 ]. In Brazil, TI brought a judicial claim arguing that the National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA) didn’t have legal authority for regulation of tobacco products, which resulted in a delay of six years in implementing the ban on flavours and additives in tobacco products.…”