d e n t a l m a t e r i a l s 3 1 ( 2 0 1 5 ) [624][625][626][627][628][629][630][631][632][633][634][635][636][637][638][639] Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w . i n t l . e l s e v i e r h e a l t h . c o m / j o u r n a l s / d e m a
ReviewAll-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. d e n t a l m a t e r i a l s 3 1 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 624-639
625(12.9%) compared to metal-ceramic FDPs (0.6%) and densely sintered zirconia FDPs (1.9%) in 5 years in function. However, the incidence of ceramic fractures and loss of retention was significantly (p = 0.018 and 0.028 respectively) higher for densely sintered zirconia FDPs compared to all other types of FDPs.Conclusions. Survival rates of all types of all-ceramic FDPs were lower than those reported for metal-ceramic FDPs. The incidence of framework fractures was significantly higher for reinforced glass ceramic FDPs and infiltrated glass ceramic FDPs, and the incidence for ceramic fractures and loss of retention was significantly higher for densely sintered zirconia FDPs compared to metal-ceramic FDPs.